Originally Posted by BillyCabrio
And with the Rs Turbo engine having such good reliability
You prob drive like i do about 1% of the time so a 2.0 non turbo is just right for me mate, especially doing nearly 200 miles a week.
Anyway, i'd waste you in ya RsT..........................Until ya turbo cuts in that is
I think your find that every mile the RST clocks up is the same sort of "hard" mile that your clocking up. The RST only gets thrashed when it comes out to play
oh its done 104K thats a fair few so far
i was compairing performance figures from the RST and the ST170 on low down torque for Steve, and the RST is very supprising. It matches the ST170 for torque and bhp right upto 3000 rpm when the turbo then whooops the ST170's ass, So bring it on paul
