Originally Posted by Redkop
I had already had read that in The Shropshire Star at the time.
This case, when re-heard should now be able to set a precedence for future ones.
I still feel PC Milton thought he'd be above the law though and I think he deserves [maybe too strong a word] to at least get 9 points and a huge fine, but not at the cost of losing his job.
Personally I'd like to see what was shown as evidence in court before I would even consider what suitable punishment (if any) is needed. We can't have a legal mentality that speed is a measurement of risk, this is the justification that speed cameras work on.