rolling road question
#4
10K+ Poster!!
When I watched Mark Shead mapping a couple of cars for their final power run his lap top is reading directly from the car ecu. He also listens for knock through earphones....but the rolling road computer is also reading the rpm and displaying on a graph.
#5
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Most reliable is a hook directly into your ignition coil. Thats the method I use where I can.
We can also monitor injector pulses, and if all else fails we just roll her up to a given speed and then tell the dyno that that roller speed = X RPM and it knows the gear ratio from there onwards, but thats the least reliable due to tyre flex and growth.
The following users liked this post:
STeve (09-03-2017)
Trending Topics
The following users liked this post:
The Underdog (10-03-2017)
#10
PassionFord Post Whore!!
#11
burnzy
Do you also take the reading from OBD? I'm guessing ignition signal is best as it will be real time reading, is there too much lag from OBD and that's why it's not the best method or is refresh rate no good?
I'm guessing older stuff before OBD you have no other choice.
I'm guessing older stuff before OBD you have no other choice.
#12
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Do you also take the reading from OBD? I'm guessing ignition signal is best as it will be real time reading, is there too much lag from OBD and that's why it's not the best method or is refresh rate no good?
I'm guessing older stuff before OBD you have no other choice.
I'm guessing older stuff before OBD you have no other choice.
Because HP = Torque x RPM ÷ 5252, if you only got say, 20 RPM readings over a 10 second power run, you would then only have 20 torque data entries.
The power would then be interplated between those columns, giving a very smooth, but unrepresentative account of the power curve.
On some newer cars, the OBD refresh rate is great and can be used, but those seem to be pretty few and far between.
Probably due more to an incompatability with my dyno and newer protocols though admittedly.
Last edited by Stu @ M Developments; 10-03-2017 at 01:46 PM.
The following users liked this post:
burnzy (10-03-2017)
#14
PassionFord Post Whore!!
The speedo I'm looking at is calibrated over 2 miles, the more accurate the 2 miles the more accurate the speedo is. It must count pulses over the miles. I will double check the instructions though.
#18
burnzy
OBD refresh rate is rubbish. We can do if need be, but the resolution is poor as the dyno graph can only be drawn with the same resolution as its RPM input because.
Because HP = Torque x RPM ÷ 5252, if you only got say, 20 RPM readings over a 10 second power run, you would then only have 20 torque data entries.
The power would then be interplated between those columns, giving a very smooth, but unrepresentative account of the power curve.
On some newer cars, the OBD refresh rate is great and can be used, but those seem to be pretty few and far between.
Probably due more to an incompatability with my dyno and newer protocols though admittedly.
Because HP = Torque x RPM ÷ 5252, if you only got say, 20 RPM readings over a 10 second power run, you would then only have 20 torque data entries.
The power would then be interplated between those columns, giving a very smooth, but unrepresentative account of the power curve.
On some newer cars, the OBD refresh rate is great and can be used, but those seem to be pretty few and far between.
Probably due more to an incompatability with my dyno and newer protocols though admittedly.
#19
PassionFord Post Whore!!
https://www.merlinmotorsport.co.uk/f...structions.pdf
https://www.merlinmotorsport.co.uk/p...ce-st3801-3802
#20
cossie fan (unluckerly)
Tom Toms cause no end of arguments at my work lol dam things. We calibrate tachos at my work in trucks as we are a tacho agent. The rollers are calibrated every year and the amount of time I hear my tacho is wrong as my speedo says such and such but my sat nav says different
The following users liked this post:
studabear (10-03-2017)