What Turbo for the Westy....
#43
20K+ Super Poster.
question? does stu kinda know what he's talking about and can give some of the best advise?
ignore chip, he just loves GT30s
ignore chip, he just loves GT30s
#51
.......................
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lee, like I said. We know where there is a brand new TT T38 sitting doing nothing in the boot of a Focus.
Did you just make that diff ratio up?
Did you just make that diff ratio up?
Last edited by polly_x; 28-08-2008 at 01:59 PM.
#53
I loved my T34 .63
Everyone advised a .48, and whilst that was a good conversion on the road, you're always in the power band on track, so it'll be fine.
Was absolutely 100% reliable, was plenty punchy enough, and ran enough boost without any issues to make it thoroughly enjoyable on track.
Everyone advised a .48, and whilst that was a good conversion on the road, you're always in the power band on track, so it'll be fine.
Was absolutely 100% reliable, was plenty punchy enough, and ran enough boost without any issues to make it thoroughly enjoyable on track.
#54
T34 .63 with a good map will have 2bar plus of boost by around 3850rpm and at that weight of vehicle i think its ideal. (Although your cutback may scrub that back to 4K+)
Its tried and tested on the YB and wont be shitting itself mid track day if you keep held boost to sensible levels.
Its tried and tested on the YB and wont be shitting itself mid track day if you keep held boost to sensible levels.
#56
.......................
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
T34 .63 with a good map will have 2bar plus of boost by around 3850rpm and at that weight of vehicle i think its ideal. (Although your cutback may scrub that back to 4K+)
Its tried and tested on the YB and wont be shitting itself mid track day if you keep held boost to sensible levels.
Its tried and tested on the YB and wont be shitting itself mid track day if you keep held boost to sensible levels.
Do you need anymore persuading!
And guess what.......You have an MSD setup sitting in my garage tailored for that exact spec!
Last time I will say it. You dont need know fancy stuff and testing different types! Its a Westy track car, not an F1 car!!!
T34.63 Standard......TRIED, TESTED, FIT AND FORGET!
#61
15K+ Super Poster!!
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: All over the friggin place!!!
Posts: 18,685
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
you do realise i would like continue driving percy, and eventually the westfield, and spending time with the man i love..... if i lock this thread.... all of those things just disappear........
#68
Turbo
I was asking as I run a similar type car that I mainly use for endurance rallying. I run a T38 now from turbo technics on a 400+ bhp YB
I have different ratios ranging from 3.23 3.73 4.11 on 16 x 45 x 245 rear tyres. I have found my choice of diff really effects the characteristics of the engine in respect of performance. I am currently setup on a 3.73 which is the best all round setup for roads and mountains. With the 4.11 it would hit the limiter in 5th to quickly but climb mountains like it was on the flat. I also run a Turbo smart two stage electric boost controller and quite aggressive ALS.
The cars off to do the GOME www.guildofmotorendurance.co.uk rally from Monaco to Roma in two weeks.
I have different ratios ranging from 3.23 3.73 4.11 on 16 x 45 x 245 rear tyres. I have found my choice of diff really effects the characteristics of the engine in respect of performance. I am currently setup on a 3.73 which is the best all round setup for roads and mountains. With the 4.11 it would hit the limiter in 5th to quickly but climb mountains like it was on the flat. I also run a Turbo smart two stage electric boost controller and quite aggressive ALS.
The cars off to do the GOME www.guildofmotorendurance.co.uk rally from Monaco to Roma in two weeks.
#75
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Mark
#79
PassionFord Post Whore!!
if its a car to be used on the road
would a .48 suit it better?
i have a light car, not as light as yours but still applies,
without the weight the engine takes longer to build load.
i had a t38.63 and it was horrible on the road,
ive now gone to a t34.48 to reduce the lag and make it more user friendly/fun on the road.
if that doesnt work i can always upgrade to a .63 later on if i dont enjoy this.
take chips offer, try both back to back and see what you prefer,
cheapest, easiest option with the best result.
would a .48 suit it better?
i have a light car, not as light as yours but still applies,
without the weight the engine takes longer to build load.
i had a t38.63 and it was horrible on the road,
ive now gone to a t34.48 to reduce the lag and make it more user friendly/fun on the road.
if that doesnt work i can always upgrade to a .63 later on if i dont enjoy this.
take chips offer, try both back to back and see what you prefer,
cheapest, easiest option with the best result.