PassionFord - Ford Focus, Escort & RS Forum Discussion

PassionFord - Ford Focus, Escort & RS Forum Discussion (https://passionford.com/forum/index.php)
-   Ford Sierra/Sapphire/RS500 Cosworth (https://passionford.com/forum/ford-sierra-sapphire-rs500-cosworth-16/)
-   -   Ford sierra 1.6 cvh improvement (https://passionford.com/forum/ford-sierra-sapphire-rs500-cosworth/395414-ford-sierra-1-6-cvh-improvement.html)

bulbashar 02-06-2011 11:53 AM

Ford sierra 1.6 cvh improvement
 
hello again!
i hove one more question about the lazy 1.6 80hp sierra
is there any way to make this engine produce more hp by reprogramming the ecu?
i know that this engine is made for not to take any modifications but i don;t want to accept it
i can believe that it produces only 80 hp while other engines of the same age were producing at lest 100hp
can i do somethinh except from changing parts from the inside of the engine?

Phil2002 02-06-2011 11:59 AM

waste of time trying just put a twink in it.

møffe 02-06-2011 02:41 PM

its the same engine as RST and XR3i

or zetec fits in its place.

lots of things to do.

bulbashar 02-06-2011 03:22 PM

ppffffff........can i improve it by remapping the ecu?

chaffe 02-06-2011 03:25 PM


Originally Posted by bulbashar (Post 5487246)
ppffffff........can i improve it by remapping the ecu?

Nope, is it monopoint injection?

bulbashar 02-06-2011 03:27 PM

yes......

chaffe 02-06-2011 03:28 PM


Originally Posted by bulbashar (Post 5487255)
yes......

well there is your problem, the xr2i + xr3i were both multi point injection and made 110 bhp

tabetha 02-06-2011 06:03 PM

You can improve it, without going inside the engine, but it will be a serious money pit, for next to no gain, this would involve different ecu/injection/exhaust etc.
A serious waste of time trying imo.
tabetha

bulbashar 12-10-2011 05:50 PM

can anyone tell me the difference between cosworth springs and thsese from 1.6cvh..
i ask it beacause i putted eibach springs code 3503-240(which propable are for cosworth) to my cvh and the look is terrible..the car seems to be loaded at the back....
i have this fear so i would like to know!!!thanks

Gibbo87 12-10-2011 06:33 PM

I could be wrong but I'm sure cosworths were lower than stock sierras from the start so that would explain why

martysmartie 14-10-2011 05:28 PM

What he said ^^, the Cosworth is lower than lesser models, and as such the springs are shorter are rated differently.

In addition, the whole rear beam is different on a Cosworth model (2WD), as are the trailing arms, the latter are different so as to suit the lower ride height IIRC.

To be honest you most likely have ruined the geometry and it will handle worse on those than it did before!

Martin

mechanic28 15-10-2011 01:54 PM

i thought 4x4 sapp cossies sit up at the back where 2wd ones sit even

martysmartie 16-10-2011 05:48 PM


Originally Posted by mechanic28 (Post 5663167)
i thought 4x4 sapp cossies sit up at the back where 2wd ones sit even

4x4 has a higher ride height overall, I know 3DRS have a "Nose dive" stance, not sure on the 4x4.

Martin


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:44 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands