help on the zetec turbo conversion
#1
15000
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: morecambe
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
help on the zetec turbo conversion
i no everyone has a busy life and maybe not alot of time to take out i had a read through a few posts about the zetec turbo conversions and just wondered if someone would do a page on it so if new people are wanting to do the conversion its all there on one page all the infomation they need just a thought i will be honest i am struggling to know which parts to use for the zetec turbo and i dont want to keep pestering people about it lol
up to now i have the manifold +adaptor plate,turbo,intercooler and downpipe
parts i need are intercooler pipes and to make some brackets to attach the intercooler and to drill the sump for the oil feed
i have the 1.8 zetec ford focus 1998 model it has the black cam cover so take it this is the black top focus do i need to buy a EFI inlet or the rover turbo inlet for this conversion
i just need as much info as i can get thanks alot everyone if you can help
up to now i have the manifold +adaptor plate,turbo,intercooler and downpipe
parts i need are intercooler pipes and to make some brackets to attach the intercooler and to drill the sump for the oil feed
i have the 1.8 zetec ford focus 1998 model it has the black cam cover so take it this is the black top focus do i need to buy a EFI inlet or the rover turbo inlet for this conversion
i just need as much info as i can get thanks alot everyone if you can help
#2
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (12)
ok yes you can use the fiesta efi inlet,also the rover one,the easiest inlet i would say to use would be the rs1800 efi jobbie as it can flow 300+you then could get away with using fiesta charge carrier and make your own hoses to suit, what are you doing for internals,if you are running reliable high power you would need a low comp pistons and steel rods,some people have just used a decomp plate,
#3
An eye for detail...
iTrader: (1)
Im doing the same engine in my MK4 cab, i only plan for around 180bhp so standard rods shot peened, they're apparently good for 250ish when shot peened.
What pistons you using? Im not using decomp plate purely for safety and reliability. I've only one set of pistons in mind which may or may not work yet, i've to get the full dimensions. Im not spending 600quid on a forged set just for sake of lowering comp ratio.
What pistons you using? Im not using decomp plate purely for safety and reliability. I've only one set of pistons in mind which may or may not work yet, i've to get the full dimensions. Im not spending 600quid on a forged set just for sake of lowering comp ratio.
#6
An eye for detail...
iTrader: (1)
I was going to get a T25 from a 200sx, cause it'll fit the RS manifold if you rotate the ex housing and fit adjutable actuator. Injectors will work too then.
How difficult is it to get a decomp plate made up, then welded to the head? Effectively making the head taller, but no need for 2 gaskets. Can't see it being perfect without welding round each oil/waterway though, then machining the holes to right size again.
How difficult is it to get a decomp plate made up, then welded to the head? Effectively making the head taller, but no need for 2 gaskets. Can't see it being perfect without welding round each oil/waterway though, then machining the holes to right size again.
#7
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: kent
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#8
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (12)
I was going to get a T25 from a 200sx, cause it'll fit the RS manifold if you rotate the ex housing and fit adjutable actuator. Injectors will work too then.
How difficult is it to get a decomp plate made up, then welded to the head? Effectively making the head taller, but no need for 2 gaskets. Can't see it being perfect without welding round each oil/waterway though, then machining the holes to right size again.
How difficult is it to get a decomp plate made up, then welded to the head? Effectively making the head taller, but no need for 2 gaskets. Can't see it being perfect without welding round each oil/waterway though, then machining the holes to right size again.
#9
An eye for detail...
iTrader: (1)
what method would be used to bond it to the head??
sounds less perminent than i'd like lol. I'd be using 1.8 zetec.
How much would standard pistons cope with then? And is it possible to shot peen them like con rods? (i wouldn't have thought so)
I only plan for circa 180bhp. Maybe more at a push but thats enough.
sounds less perminent than i'd like lol. I'd be using 1.8 zetec.
How much would standard pistons cope with then? And is it possible to shot peen them like con rods? (i wouldn't have thought so)
I only plan for circa 180bhp. Maybe more at a push but thats enough.
#12
15000
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: morecambe
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ok yes you can use the fiesta efi inlet,also the rover one,the easiest inlet i would say to use would be the rs1800 efi jobbie as it can flow 300+you then could get away with using fiesta charge carrier and make your own hoses to suit, what are you doing for internals,if you are running reliable high power you would need a low comp pistons and steel rods,some people have just used a decomp plate,
the rs 1800 inlet you mentioned well i have found a ford FIESTA RS1800i 1995 model on an N reg RS TURBO XR2 would that be good to use on the conversion
#15
PassionFord Regular
Why do people advise using early Zetec or Rover manifolds on turbo conversions of Blacktops?
The Mk1 Focus RS used the circa '98-02 plastic manifold no problems. Lots of people use them on conversions without the silly metal reinforcement parts.
Martin
The Mk1 Focus RS used the circa '98-02 plastic manifold no problems. Lots of people use them on conversions without the silly metal reinforcement parts.
Martin
#19
An eye for detail...
iTrader: (1)
I've got xr3i mfi at moment. So to convert that to turbo is about as much work as converting to zetec turbo more or less. One or two extra probs but that's offset by the benefit of newer better engine with more valves.
Not much difference in price at the end of it all either.
#20
PassionFord Regular
In other words why drop the standard manifold that came with the Blacktop engine and source something else.
I presumed there must be an obvious advantage for all the trouble they add on a Blacktop conversion which someone could list. Such as what 'more scope at a later date'.
Martin
#23
PassionFord Regular
Is that based on experience ? Is it pressure that kills it or fatigue. Pre or Post 2002 manifolds.
I'm also not sure that a RS1800 manifold will fit under a Focus bonnet.
As I said, the plastic manifold is good enough for the FRS and several turbo conversions I know of. I'm only asking because I get the impression that many people offering advice are stuck in a pre-98 time warp with little detailed knowledge of the Blacktop and its components.
I'm also not sure that a RS1800 manifold will fit under a Focus bonnet.
As I said, the plastic manifold is good enough for the FRS and several turbo conversions I know of. I'm only asking because I get the impression that many people offering advice are stuck in a pre-98 time warp with little detailed knowledge of the Blacktop and its components.
#24
Regular Contributor
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CENTRAL SCOTLAND
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
zetec
i have done loads 2.1s only done 1 1800 conversion as budget was tight,i rebuilt bottom end,skimmed 30thow of pistons,ported head,it made 187@wheels on 12psi,that was its limt as slight detonation was heard on 13,14psi,the car in question is still as i built it 4 years ago,cost was just under Ł1000 pounds.job done,inc buying lump.
#26
PassionFord Regular
Why 'Obviously'. Just because its 'Plastic'. It depends on the actual material, design, method of manufacture, etc. Being plastic is not an automatic low limit to a safe working pressure.
The Chemical and Oil & Gas and Fuel Gas industries would be in big trouble it was. Local gas distribution is in big (or small) yellow plastic piping. What sort of pressures do you thing that runs at in the street and district distribution?
Martin
The Chemical and Oil & Gas and Fuel Gas industries would be in big trouble it was. Local gas distribution is in big (or small) yellow plastic piping. What sort of pressures do you thing that runs at in the street and district distribution?
Martin
#28
PassionFord Regular
Sorry, another oft' used, and almost completely specious, red herring.
Given the surface area and wall temp and induction flow rate, even on a N/A engine the heat transfer in inlet tract is not significant.
The only significance of heatsoak is either at idle/slow trickling with the air intake in 'dead space' in the engine bay that becomes/stays a hot spot. Many people don't understand under bonnet air flow and don't allow for the effects of the air intake actually having a major influence more significant than any imagined 'ram' effect from vents/ducts.
Martin
Given the surface area and wall temp and induction flow rate, even on a N/A engine the heat transfer in inlet tract is not significant.
The only significance of heatsoak is either at idle/slow trickling with the air intake in 'dead space' in the engine bay that becomes/stays a hot spot. Many people don't understand under bonnet air flow and don't allow for the effects of the air intake actually having a major influence more significant than any imagined 'ram' effect from vents/ducts.
Martin
#30
PassionFord Regular
IIRC the correction on RR is about 1% of torque for 5degreeC change in temperature.
On Cruise or Acceleration on a decent (ie standard Focus) induction system or an aluminium long tube (AEM copy) system, ambient to AIT temperature difference is less than 1degree. On a RR, which is not a true test of the induction system, the loss due to filter box & snorkle was about 1.5% (just tb to MAF silicon hose and the MAF).
Martin
On Cruise or Acceleration on a decent (ie standard Focus) induction system or an aluminium long tube (AEM copy) system, ambient to AIT temperature difference is less than 1degree. On a RR, which is not a true test of the induction system, the loss due to filter box & snorkle was about 1.5% (just tb to MAF silicon hose and the MAF).
Martin
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post