General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

YB standard internals power limit ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 12:09 PM
  #1  
cossie51's Avatar
cossie51
Thread Starter
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: normally at work
Default YB standard internals power limit ?

Trying to work out if I can safely push more power out of my engine as it's still running a standard bottom end with valve pockets in the pistons.
Currently maxed my T34/63 at 426bhp holding 21psi boost so looking in to a turbo change but not sure what to go for and how far I can push it and keep some sort of reliability as I'm not looking to do a full rebuild and spec change just yet.
car is on New Link G4+ management with all safety strategies enabled.
Told by my mapper it's good but so restricted by the turbo and something newer and larger would transform the car even more.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 12:40 PM
  #2  
5hane's Avatar
5hane
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 106
Likes: 9
Default

Which block do you have?
If 200, is it long studded? - I would imagine keeping the head bolted down would be your limiting factor

426 is a lot of power for a 34/63, has it been modified? (billet wheel/ cutback blades etc)
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 12:42 PM
  #3  
dan le moignan's Avatar
dan le moignan
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 677
Likes: 39
From: Down south!
Default

Surprised by the power thought about 27psi held was around 380?

iam in the same boat holding 27 psi but want abit more about 450hp, standard low mileage engine, had new grp N head gasket about 10k ago.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 12:56 PM
  #4  
scoooby slayer's Avatar
scoooby slayer
10K+ Poster!!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,212
Likes: 417
From: st neots cambridgeshire
Default

426 hp at 21 psi on a t34 a physics defying turbo then lmfao
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 12:59 PM
  #5  
cossie51's Avatar
cossie51
Thread Starter
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: normally at work
Default

Originally Posted by 5hane
Which block do you have?
If 200, is it long studded? - I would imagine keeping the head bolted down would be your limiting factor

426 is a lot of power for a 34/63, has it been modified? (billet wheel/ cutback blades etc)
It's a 200 block but has ARP Stud & Nut kit fitted which was done correctly to the ARP specs. Head is mildly ported and polished with bd16 inlet cam and AS Plenum and 65mm id electronic Throttle body so free flowing hence the low boost pressure. When on the standard inlet set up it was holding 30 psi on the same turbo.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 01:06 PM
  #6  
cossie51's Avatar
cossie51
Thread Starter
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: normally at work
Default


Dyno graph shows the figures
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 01:07 PM
  #7  
Adam-M's Avatar
Adam-M
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 316
From: Scotland
Default

If longstudded a standard 4x4 engine should do over 500 don’t know how good the arp boot setup is
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 01:18 PM
  #8  
scoooby slayer's Avatar
scoooby slayer
10K+ Poster!!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,212
Likes: 417
From: st neots cambridgeshire
Default

Originally Posted by cossie51

Dyno graph shows the figures

The turbo must be flat out on a well specced motor on an engine Dyno to do that power imo
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 01:18 PM
  #9  
cossie51's Avatar
cossie51
Thread Starter
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: normally at work
Default

Originally Posted by Adam-M
If longstudded a standard 4x4 engine should do over 500 don’t know how good the arp boot setup is
lots of people say they crack blocks but read in to it and it seems it's luck of the draw ! When reading up on it they said loads were install incorrectly hence cracking orthers said they had been at 500bhp with no problems and a few said they were installed correctly and still caused cracking in the deck face.

Dont really want to pull engine apart to long stud at the moment as when I do take it apart I want to build a bulletproof engine but not really got the funds to go that far at the moment.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 01:21 PM
  #10  
cossie51's Avatar
cossie51
Thread Starter
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: normally at work
Default

Originally Posted by scoooby slayer
The turbo must be flat out on a well specced motor on an engine Dyno to do that power imo
the turbo is flat out hence wanting to know what to use turbo wise and how far I can push it and keep reliably till funds allow for a big spec bulletproof engine build.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 01:33 PM
  #11  
scoooby slayer's Avatar
scoooby slayer
10K+ Poster!!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,212
Likes: 417
From: st neots cambridgeshire
Default

Originally Posted by cossie51

the turbo is flat out hence wanting to know what to use turbo wise and how far I can push it and keep reliably till funds allow for a big spec bulletproof engine build.

Are you looking for a direct fitment turbo ? A t38 or a T4 should be a bolt in replacement, old hat but will get the job done. I'm not sure what needs changeing to fit an efr or similar modern turbo
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 01:39 PM
  #12  
Adam-M's Avatar
Adam-M
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,120
Likes: 316
From: Scotland
Default

I don’t think cosworth would of redesigned the block to suite longer studs if they could of got away with standard length studs that don’t stretch like standard studs
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 01:52 PM
  #13  
cossie51's Avatar
cossie51
Thread Starter
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: normally at work
Default

Originally Posted by scoooby slayer
Are you looking for a direct fitment turbo ? A t38 or a T4 should be a bolt in replacement, old hat but will get the job done. I'm not sure what needs changeing to fit an efr or similar modern turbo
Don't see the point in paying out for an old technology turbo as don't want to he car to be laggy with all the power up top.

An EFR would require a twin scroll manifold and a down pipe mod which is no problem. My mapper suggested the new Garret G25 series turbo which would require modding my manifold or a replacement but I don't know anyone that has fitted one to know if they work with a YB. There may be other modern turbos that I could use ?

the questions are what turbo, what size, internal or external wastegate, and how far I can push the engine but keep it reliable.
Im looking to try and find a happy medium where I can run more power by changing turbos but keep it reliable and safe at the same time. I would rather get a smaller power gain but be safe than a big gain with the fear it's going to go bang at any point. If that makes sense.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 02:01 PM
  #14  
cossie51's Avatar
cossie51
Thread Starter
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: normally at work
Default

Originally Posted by Adam-M
I don’t think cosworth would of redesigned the block to suite longer studs if they could of got away with standard length studs that don’t stretch like standard studs
The ideal step forward would be long studs but mine has the ARP kit fitted on a running engine so not looking to take it apart to long stud it yet. That will come when it comes out for a big power spec rebuild.
i wasn't trying to imply ARP Stud kit was a fit and forget, just currently working with what it's got.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 02:22 PM
  #15  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

Mine did 469bhp on 7064 efr, standard engine and would have done more but high intake temps
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 02:46 PM
  #16  
dan le moignan's Avatar
dan le moignan
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 677
Likes: 39
From: Down south!
Default

Toby were you on standard 4x4 inlet?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 02:49 PM
  #17  
scoooby slayer's Avatar
scoooby slayer
10K+ Poster!!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,212
Likes: 417
From: st neots cambridgeshire
Default

Originally Posted by cossie51

Don't see the point in paying out for an old technology turbo as don't want to he car to be laggy with all the power up top.

An EFR would require a twin scroll manifold and a down pipe mod which is no problem. My mapper suggested the new Garret G25 series turbo which would require modding my manifold or a replacement but I don't know anyone that has fitted one to know if they work with a YB. There may be other modern turbos that I could use ?

the questions are what turbo, what size, internal or external wastegate, and how far I can push the engine but keep it reliable.
Im looking to try and find a happy medium where I can run more power by changing turbos but keep it reliable and safe at the same time. I would rather get a smaller power gain but be safe than a big gain with the fear it's going to go bang at any point. If that makes sense.

On a 200 block motor I ran 472 hp with standard head bolts without issues, some of these modern turbos might fit internal gate with just a mod to downpipe needed

Mark Shead will know what will fit, or a gt30 maybe
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 03:07 PM
  #18  
turbotrev's Avatar
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 89
From: Sutton
Default

Has the engine had a rebuild?
You say it's got pocketed pistons and an arp bolt kit which all ain’t standard so it’s not really a standard bottom end...
What head gasket you on?
if it’s all in good nick and has a decent head gasket I’d say between 450-500 and you should be ok.
Especially if not running crazy boost levels

Cheers Paul
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 03:49 PM
  #19  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

Originally Posted by dan le moignan
Toby were you on standard 4x4 inlet?
at the time yes. And a not very good rs500 style cooler. I swapped to a Hart later and will probably go individual bodies next.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 04:44 PM
  #20  
cossie51's Avatar
cossie51
Thread Starter
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: normally at work
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
Has the engine had a rebuild?
You say it's got pocketed pistons and an arp bolt kit which all ain’t standard so it’s not really a standard bottom end...
What head gasket you on?
if it’s all in good nick and has a decent head gasket I’d say between 450-500 and you should be ok.
Especially if not running crazy boost levels

Cheers Paul
Paul, it's on standard crank, rods, and pistons but valve cut outs were machined in so I could run bigger cams. Engine has done about 4K miles since it was built 5 years ago including 1500 miles on a running in map. It's got a multi layer steel WRC head gasket fitted,
turbo has only been pushed to its limit since it had the Link management fitted and mapped in Nov 18.
Its the black saph you posted pics of last Sunday in cobham services !
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 08:11 PM
  #21  
dan le moignan's Avatar
dan le moignan
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 677
Likes: 39
From: Down south!
Default

Originally Posted by Caddyshack


at the time yes. And a not very good rs500 style cooler. I swapped to a Hart later and will probably go individual bodies next.
Cool didn’t know if a small turbo plenuim would be needed around those figures
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 08:15 PM
  #22  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

Originally Posted by dan le moignan


Cool didn’t know if a small turbo plenuim would be needed around those figures
some people fit a spacer but finding a 2nd hand hart or the copy is worth having....I believe. A good intercooler is an important part, worth having a chat with Mark Shead on a few options.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 08:18 PM
  #23  
dan le moignan's Avatar
dan le moignan
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 677
Likes: 39
From: Down south!
Default

Did read about the spacer but most say it’s the elbow that’s the real restriction it seems.
Guess smaller the inlet the less lag?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 08:59 PM
  #24  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

Originally Posted by dan le moignan
Did read about the spacer but most say it’s the elbow that’s the real restriction it seems.
Guess smaller the inlet the less lag?
‘Not sure the inlet size will affect lag unless we are talking really big volumes to fill...I could be wrong though? I guess it’s about speed of airflow and less restrictions means less heat. I know the Hart flows better and with a nice top feed spec r, alternative or even airtec top feed you get a better cooling and a bit more power if mapped to suit. (Or can run more boost)
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 09:17 PM
  #25  
dan le moignan's Avatar
dan le moignan
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 677
Likes: 39
From: Down south!
Default

Guess very minimal,
I have an airtec RS500 cooler at the moment and never really goes over 28 degrees once moving in the summer, not sure how good the flow is though
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 09:32 PM
  #26  
charlie luciano's Avatar
charlie luciano
10K+ Poster!!
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 88
From: Classified
Default

I ran a gt30/71 on my Sapphire on a standard engine that had been rebuilt a few thousand miles previously, have to say it didn’t last very long, the engine let go during a live road map and upon strip down there was milk at the back of the engine where the head bolts to the block.

Prior to the live map when I had fitted a few more spangly bits chasing more horse power the car ran 420 bhp with 400 ft/lbs torque. It had switchable maps low boost 15 psi high 30 psi.

if you are chasing big horse power 400+ you’ll definitely need a decent rebuild with long studs imo
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 09:40 PM
  #27  
scoooby slayer's Avatar
scoooby slayer
10K+ Poster!!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,212
Likes: 417
From: st neots cambridgeshire
Default

Originally Posted by charlie luciano
I ran a gt30/71 on my Sapphire on a standard engine that had been rebuilt a few thousand miles previously, have to say it didn’t last very long, the engine let go during a live road map and upon strip down there was milk at the back of the engine where the head bolts to the block.

Prior to the live map when I had fitted a few more spangly bits chasing more horse power the car ran 420 bhp with 400 ft/lbs torque. It had switchable maps low boost 15 psi high 30 psi.

if you are chasing big horse power 400+ you’ll definitely need a decent rebuild with long studs imo

My last saph was built by an ex nms employee, 200 Turkish block, 7.2 c/r, wrc gasket and standard head bolts, ran a T4 msd live mapped to 2.2 bar above 5300 rpm, 472 hp and never gave any problems, it can be done and be reliable

30-130 mph was 12-13 seconds iirc
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 10:20 PM
  #28  
cossie51's Avatar
cossie51
Thread Starter
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: normally at work
Default

After lots of reading it looks like a internal gated EFR 7064 would give me what I am looking for power wise without to much stress on the engine.

Anyone tried the new G25 series turbo yet or know if they are as good as the EFR turbos seem to be ?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 11:11 PM
  #29  
turnover's Avatar
turnover
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 34
From: midlands
Default

If your engine is running fine at the boost and revs your running just put a gt30 with a 63 or 82 housing at the same boost you will make more power,as long as it’s re tuned and injectors and fuel system is adequate you’ll be fine
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 11:34 PM
  #30  
cossie51's Avatar
cossie51
Thread Starter
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: normally at work
Default

Originally Posted by turnover
If your engine is running fine at the boost and revs your running just put a gt30 with a 63 or 82 housing at the same boost you will make more power,as long as it’s re tuned and injectors and fuel system is adequate you’ll be fine
Gt30 or Gtx30 gen 2 ?
O44 pump and ID1050x injectors so fuel supply shouldn't be an issue!
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 11:35 PM
  #31  
turbotrev's Avatar
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 89
From: Sutton
Default

Originally Posted by cossie51

Paul, it's on standard crank, rods, and pistons but valve cut outs were machined in so I could run bigger cams. Engine has done about 4K miles since it was built 5 years ago including 1500 miles on a running in map. It's got a multi layer steel WRC head gasket fitted,
turbo has only been pushed to its limit since it had the Link management fitted and mapped in Nov 18.
Its the black saph you posted pics of last Sunday in cobham services !
Mate I didn’t even notice sorry, car looked sweet last week btw.

It sounds like it’s in decent nick then and 4k miles ain’t a lot, and a proper headgasket fitted too.

So I’d say easy 450-500hp.

Like many have said choose a decent turbo for another 50-80hp and you’ll be good.

Lots of turbo choices out there, new Garrett, Owens GTB, efr’s, small gt30, etc

Cheers Paul
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 11:39 PM
  #32  
turbotrev's Avatar
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 89
From: Sutton
Default

Originally Posted by turnover
If your engine is running fine at the boost and revs your running just put a gt30 with a 63 or 82 housing at the same boost you will make more power,as long as it’s re tuned and injectors and fuel system is adequate you’ll be fine
Good advice this

Cheers Paul
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2019 | 11:39 PM
  #33  
turbotrev's Avatar
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 89
From: Sutton
Default

Originally Posted by cossie51

Gt30 or Gtx30 gen 2 ?
O44 pump and ID1050x injectors so fuel supply shouldn't be an issue!
GT30 not GTX

Cheers Paul
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2019 | 11:58 AM
  #34  
dan le moignan's Avatar
dan le moignan
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 677
Likes: 39
From: Down south!
Default

GT3071R seems an easy option with the Cosworth housing so it can go straight on a standard manifold?
same lag as T34 from what the majority say.
i quite like the way the power comes in on the T34 As love that turbo surge of power.
Lazy part of me says throw a GT30 on but guess the efr makes sense for the cost of a manifold?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2019 | 12:11 PM
  #35  
cossie51's Avatar
cossie51
Thread Starter
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 258
Likes: 6
From: normally at work
Default

I'm tempted to try the new Garret G25 series but as they are still quit new theirs not a lot of info as to if they are as good or better than the likes of the EFR plus their is no twin scroll option available at the moment but it's meant to coming soon.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2019 | 09:13 AM
  #36  
R4N SS's Avatar
R4N SS
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 27,161
Likes: 147
From: ?
Default

Originally Posted by dan le moignan
Did read about the spacer but most say it’s the elbow that’s the real restriction it seems.
Guess smaller the inlet the less lag?
It is the elbow that is the restriction - on my old engine on the 2wd inlet i had the elbow modified so it wasnt as restrictive and also had a 14mm spacer added.

New engine has a hart inlet on it which im sure will be much better
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2019 | 09:38 AM
  #37  
timsrs's Avatar
timsrs
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 923
Likes: 10
From: Derbyshire
Default

4x4 inlet has much less restrictions
and a lot less to buy.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2019 | 11:03 AM
  #38  
ajamesc's Avatar
ajamesc
cossie fan (unluckerly)
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 9,798
Likes: 435
From: hampshire
Default

I had a small turbo escort inlet and throttle body on my 500bhp engine. That was the best option of the 3 standard ones
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2019 | 11:26 AM
  #39  
scoooby slayer's Avatar
scoooby slayer
10K+ Poster!!
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 10,212
Likes: 417
From: st neots cambridgeshire
Default

My old one had a 4x4 inlet with spacer iirc, bd14 cams and a T4 at 2.2 bar, but it maxed out at 472 hp I'm not sure what stopped it achieving 500 hp though
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2019 | 01:35 PM
  #40  
Caddyshack's Avatar
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 10,837
Likes: 1,033
From: Guildford
Default

Originally Posted by scoooby slayer
My old one had a 4x4 inlet with spacer iirc, bd14 cams and a T4 at 2.2 bar, but it maxed out at 472 hp I'm not sure what stopped it achieving 500 hp though
Mine was 469bhp at 2.2 bar and held back by intercooler temps...pretty close boost and power to yours
Reply



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 PM.