General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

question regarding lower arm to sub frame pinch bolts (mot tester question)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 10:01 PM
  #1  
burnzy's Avatar
burnzy
Thread Starter
burnzy
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,000
Likes: 56
From: Birmingham
Default question regarding lower arm to sub frame pinch bolts (mot tester question)

as above, now my car passed it's mot but he did say he could of failed it cos the pinch bolt between the subframe and lower arm was upside down.

as you might know that it was the bolt that catches on the gearbox resulting in dropping the subframe to remove it in one piece, i just cut the head off and put a new one in upside down, now i can see the logic in that "if" the nut was to loosen the the bolt wouldn't fall out but it's a nylock and the chances are very slim if any that it's possible to happen, is what he was telling me the truth i chose to believe him and keep my pass anyway .

it just seems pointless as it's nylocked and a simple solution for a pain in the arse problem.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 10:13 PM
  #2  
Lloyd's Avatar
Lloyd
escort mk4 cossy 4x4
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 0
From: coventry
Default

hes telling you crap. as long as its securely bolted at the time of test,its a pass
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 10:21 PM
  #3  
burnzy's Avatar
burnzy
Thread Starter
burnzy
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,000
Likes: 56
From: Birmingham
Default

cheer's mate i did have my suspicion thats my reasoning for asking on here, seemed a silly thing to fail on as i bet i wasn't the first or last person to do this, he even had his worker admit to doing it himself, but the funniest is he's had his worker do it properly for that exact reason poor bastard i can't think of nothing worse than having to drop the subframe just to change an arm
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 10:23 PM
  #4  
bouncy's Avatar
bouncy
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: scarborough
Default

Originally Posted by Lloyd
hes telling you crap. as long as its securely bolted at the time of test,its a pass

+1
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 10:27 PM
  #5  
Harris RST's Avatar
Harris RST
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: london
Default

Originally Posted by bouncy
+1
+2

If hemwas sure it should have failed then technically he should have failed it.

If your unsure then pass advise thats what they teach you on the course
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 10:31 PM
  #6  
burnzy's Avatar
burnzy
Thread Starter
burnzy
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,000
Likes: 56
From: Birmingham
Default

Originally Posted by Harris RST
+2

If hemwas sure it should have failed then technically he should have failed it.

If your unsure then pass advise thats what they teach you on the course
i did question if it was just an advisory when we was chatting about it he told me he could fail it if i wanted so i promptly changed subject
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 10:33 PM
  #7  
Bloomers's Avatar
Bloomers
Cornish Fasty
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
From: Bristol
Default

i'm assuming this is a mondeo? if so, thats one anally retentive tester!
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 10:34 PM
  #8  
bouncy's Avatar
bouncy
Regular Contributor
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
From: scarborough
Default

Originally Posted by Burnzybubbles
i did question if it was just an advisory when we was chatting about it he told me he could fail it if i wanted so i promptly changed subject
if anyone has doubt over a failure just ask the tester to point it out in the testers guide, they all should have them!!!!

Believe you me, this is not in the guide
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2010 | 10:46 PM
  #9  
burnzy's Avatar
burnzy
Thread Starter
burnzy
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,000
Likes: 56
From: Birmingham
Default

Originally Posted by Bloomers
i'm assuming this is a mondeo? if so, thats one anally retentive tester!
yes it's the mondeo, it got pulled on a 50p size hole on the middle of the sill about 8" from the back as a fail too as it was structurally unsafe witch i though was a tad ott as i wouldn't of thought it'd made much difference to any belt or chassis points, but i got it welded for free so doesn't bother me really.

Originally Posted by bouncy
if anyone has doubt over a failure just ask the tester to point it out in the testers guide, they all should have them!!!!

Believe you me, this is not in the guide
don't worry i do believe you like i said it's why i put the question forward cos it did seem a bit silly, dunno wether getting them to get the guide out would of been a good move though i'd of just rubbed there back up and got sent home with a red piece of paper and a sad face
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2010 | 06:27 AM
  #10  
S1's Avatar
S1
...............
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,663
Likes: 0
From: Essex
Default

Many years ago after a rebuild on an S2, the tester tried to fail it because it didnt have the retaining tabs around the steering rack to bulkhead bolts. The Mk4 was never fitted with them, only the Mk3 but it took some persuading.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kam B
Cars for Sale
9
Sep 24, 2015 10:40 AM
Adam Graham
Restorations, Rebuilds & Projects.
7
Sep 6, 2015 06:04 AM
rsturbo27
General Car Related Discussion.
3
Sep 5, 2015 05:08 PM
hopper350
Garage / Workshop & Tools Section.
2
Sep 4, 2015 12:53 AM




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:54 PM.