cvh34 cam or cvh35 cam?
26-01-2006, 07:16 PM
#1
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cvh34 cam or cvh35 cam?
anybody tried a cvh34 cam on a frst with cossie spec t3 or similar?and is it a better choice than a cvh35?? ian howell rekons so,whats your oppinions??
cheers
cheers
26-01-2006, 07:41 PM
#2
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: isle of wight (K.O.P 2006 mother fucker!)
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
depends on what ya want mate, cvh34 has a different power band, and valve opening is different to the cvh35.
im going for the cvh35 for my FRST, im running P1 set up but the power banding from 2k is what im after, the cvh34 starts at 1.5k rpm.
im going for the cvh35 for my FRST, im running P1 set up but the power banding from 2k is what im after, the cvh34 starts at 1.5k rpm.
26-01-2006, 10:43 PM
#3
15000
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
turbodaily, I know that Gav has a 1.6cvh tuned by ahmed. He has got a CVH34 cam and 0.48 exhaust housing T3 turbo. Dont know what is Gav's nickname here at passionford. 
Also, if you using a 165 chip then get the CVH34 since with the CVH35 you'll go lean at high rpm.
Also, if you using a 165 chip then get the CVH34 since with the CVH35 you'll go lean at high rpm.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mc5506
Ford Escort RS Turbo
6
05-10-2015 09:57 PM