Fiesta RS1800/RS Turbo This forum is for discussion of all things pertaining to the Ford Fiesta RS Range of cars.

whats everyone got against the rs1800?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2011, 05:52 PM
  #1  
st220kyle
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
st220kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: somerset
Posts: 1,817
Received 61 Likes on 56 Posts
Default whats everyone got against the rs1800?

been looking around at these for a while now,always liked them, thinking of buying one as a small project, keeping in factory condition and geting back to same state as say, a 3-5year old car,
but all i hear is bad things about them, like 'dont deserve an rs badge'
are they really that worthless?????
Old 01-12-2011, 05:55 PM
  #2  
1.9 xr2 on 40's
st170 breaking
 
1.9 xr2 on 40's's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: norfolk
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

its a 2i with 20 more nags, they only made 500ish and they all rotten like a pear


they are just not that good a car and came when ford pretty much gave up with 'fast'

i would like to own a minter with the recaros and split pokes but they are all gone and any mk3 fiesta with plactic over teh arches is hiding something very bad

if they put a turbo on that zetec it would have been historic
Old 01-12-2011, 05:56 PM
  #3  
1.9 xr2 on 40's
st170 breaking
 
1.9 xr2 on 40's's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: norfolk
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

get a 2i and a Ł1 rs1800i badge and away you go nobody will know lol
Old 01-12-2011, 06:00 PM
  #4  
1.9 xr2 on 40's
st170 breaking
 
1.9 xr2 on 40's's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: norfolk
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

look at these 2, both rotten to hell and hiding much more
they white one has lost its recaros and it on 16v 2i interior and the black one shows teh propper seats

but i expect its the mk3 fiesta thats the bad car, not just an rs18, turbos are only good because they have a turbo, an 8v 2i is a pile of crap (ive had loads)
http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/Cars-Motor...p3286.c0.m1538
Old 01-12-2011, 06:12 PM
  #5  
rapid3door
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
rapid3door's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: bury st edmunds but still true essex boy
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its a fiesta mk3 that equals rust,horrible drive oh and rust again lol
Old 01-12-2011, 06:17 PM
  #6  
m4tt274
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
m4tt274's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 3,578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

was the RS turbo in production when the rs1800 was?
Old 01-12-2011, 06:23 PM
  #7  
1.9 xr2 on 40's
st170 breaking
 
1.9 xr2 on 40's's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: norfolk
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by m4tt274
was the RS turbo in production when the rs1800 was?
noep the cross over what when the cats came in too

latest rs's were k plates when 8v 2i's stopped (the last being the silver with recaros) and 16v's and rs18's came about

i have an original motorshow book from '92
Old 01-12-2011, 06:24 PM
  #8  
st220kyle
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
st220kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: somerset
Posts: 1,817
Received 61 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m4tt274
was the RS turbo in production when the rs1800 was?
think so, ive seen both on a j plate
Old 01-12-2011, 06:29 PM
  #9  
dug112y
passionford pro
iTrader: (1)
 
dug112y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lanarkshire,Scotland
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

if you can find a good one(difficult) there good little cars,quite nippy,cheap to fix . my track car was one a long time ago....they can be made into proper little weapons.
i have always wanted a nice std one aswell.
Old 01-12-2011, 07:08 PM
  #10  
massivewangers
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
 
massivewangers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Norfolk Drives: Couple of Fords
Posts: 5,412
Received 186 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

I think they're ok actually. Decent power in a little car, and the chassis of the later ones was much improved.

People generally prefer the RS Turbo, simply because it has a turbo, but that was hardly a gem either, with wild torque steer and a worse chassis than the RS1800.

Sadly there's a lot of snobbery and put downs amongst Ford enthusiasts, but fuck 'em, if you like them, buy one. I'd rather pay Ł12-1500 for a nice RS1800 than Ł2k for a rotten to shit RS Turbo.
Old 01-12-2011, 07:33 PM
  #11  
CrOwSoN15
Ben
 
CrOwSoN15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 4,853
Received 55 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by massivewangers
I think they're ok actually. Decent power in a little car, and the chassis of the later ones was much improved.

People generally prefer the RS Turbo, simply because it has a turbo, but that was hardly a gem either, with wild torque steer and a worse chassis than the RS1800.

Sadly there's a lot of snobbery and put downs amongst Ford enthusiasts, but fuck 'em, if you like them, buy one. I'd rather pay Ł12-1500 for a nice RS1800 than Ł2k for a rotten to shit RS Turbo.
Couldn't agree more.

Was there much power difference between an RS18 and a Turbo?

Ben.
Old 01-12-2011, 07:35 PM
  #12  
749steve
Advanced PassionFord User
iTrader: (1)
 
749steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: crowle, scunthorpe
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

my mate has one,and its rotton

but if anyone wants to buy it to reshell,or parts let me know
(and i have a proper advert for this in the right section)
Old 01-12-2011, 07:47 PM
  #13  
RstAaron.
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
RstAaron.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Norwich
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Name:  IMG_0906.jpg
Views: 2441
Size:  124.4 KB

A non rotten RS1800...

Shame I have to sell it.
Old 01-12-2011, 08:09 PM
  #14  
Fordmad!
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Fordmad!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ellesmere
Posts: 4,033
Received 45 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

I really like them! Was thinking of getting one! Only go up in ŁŁŁ
Old 03-12-2011, 07:20 PM
  #15  
rsturbonutter
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
rsturbonutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: s.wales
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It was mate yes in 92 the rs1800 and rs turbo where both available from fords. The earlier ones had the recaro's and the later ones had the wing back seats and same material door cards
Originally Posted by m4tt274
was the RS turbo in production when the rs1800 was?
Old 09-12-2011, 10:42 PM
  #16  
danny-boy
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
 
danny-boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: beaminster, dorset
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I personally love the rs1800, i've never owned an rs turbo but i have friends that still have them. rs1800's rot less then rs turbos and dont rust around the fuel filler, the rs1800 is what some people call the "mk 3.5" as ford strengthened the chassis for better handling. The rs1800 is about the same bhp but a tiny bit slower 0-60, people think it shouldnt have an rs badge because its not quite as brutal. My rs1800 has been in the family for 7 years, its my daily car, fuel economys not to bad, its pretty pokey and alot of fun, and rust wise, its almost perfect. the zetec engine is bomb proof too. Its definately a hot hatch with wayyyyyy more street cred then saxo's and 106 gti's etc. My exterior is bog standard and it might be for sale.
Old 10-12-2011, 03:08 PM
  #17  
st220kyle
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
st220kyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: somerset
Posts: 1,817
Received 61 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danny-boy
I personally love the rs1800, i've never owned an rs turbo but i have friends that still have them. rs1800's rot less then rs turbos and dont rust around the fuel filler, the rs1800 is what some people call the "mk 3.5" as ford strengthened the chassis for better handling. The rs1800 is about the same bhp but a tiny bit slower 0-60, people think it shouldnt have an rs badge because its not quite as brutal. My rs1800 has been in the family for 7 years, its my daily car, fuel economys not to bad, its pretty pokey and alot of fun, and rust wise, its almost perfect. the zetec engine is bomb proof too. Its definately a hot hatch with wayyyyyy more street cred then saxo's and 106 gti's etc. My exterior is bog standard and it might be for sale.
might be for sale? how much?????
Old 10-12-2011, 03:13 PM
  #18  
CrOwSoN15
Ben
 
CrOwSoN15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 4,853
Received 55 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danny-boy
I personally love the rs1800, i've never owned an rs turbo but i have friends that still have them. rs1800's rot less then rs turbos and dont rust around the fuel filler, the rs1800 is what some people call the "mk 3.5" as ford strengthened the chassis for better handling. The rs1800 is about the same bhp but a tiny bit slower 0-60, people think it shouldnt have an rs badge because its not quite as brutal. My rs1800 has been in the family for 7 years, its my daily car, fuel economys not to bad, its pretty pokey and alot of fun, and rust wise, its almost perfect. the zetec engine is bomb proof too. Its definately a hot hatch with wayyyyyy more street cred then saxo's and 106 gti's etc. My exterior is bog standard and it might be for sale.
Wrong on so many levels. They rot just like any other mk3 Fiesta.
The RS1800 was not the mk3.5, that was the Si.

And IMO, I'd have a VTS over one every day of the week.
Old 10-12-2011, 03:25 PM
  #19  
massivewangers
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (1)
 
massivewangers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Norfolk Drives: Couple of Fords
Posts: 5,412
Received 186 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CrOwSoN15
Wrong on so many levels. They rot just like any other mk3 Fiesta.
The RS1800 was not the mk3.5, that was the Si.

And IMO, I'd have a VTS over one every day of the week.
I'm afraid you're both wrong

RS1800 was produced in both MK3 and 3.5 variants
The following users liked this post:
AndyMc22 (26-05-2022)
Old 10-12-2011, 03:30 PM
  #20  
CrOwSoN15
Ben
 
CrOwSoN15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 4,853
Received 55 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by massivewangers
I'm afraid you're both wrong

RS1800 was produced in both MK3 and 3.5 variants
I did not know this!
I've never seen one in 3.5 guise.
Old 10-12-2011, 03:38 PM
  #21  
danny-boy
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
 
danny-boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: beaminster, dorset
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ok there is mk3 and 3.5,i apologise! i have the mk3.5 and it must be just well looked after then, rust is not an issue. Its basically a fezza rs turbo, with better handling, no torque steer, much more reliable, nicer looking alloys and same bhp. but its like 0.2 seconds slower 0-60? whats so bad about them??
The following users liked this post:
AndyMc22 (26-05-2022)
Old 10-12-2011, 03:50 PM
  #22  
CrOwSoN15
Ben
 
CrOwSoN15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 4,853
Received 55 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by danny-boy
Ok there is mk3 and 3.5,i apologise! i have the mk3.5 and it must be just well looked after then, rust is not an issue. Its basically a fezza rs turbo, with better handling, no torque steer, much more reliable, nicer looking alloys and same bhp. but its like 0.2 seconds slower 0-60? whats so bad about them??
Touche!
The torque steer is part of the fun of having an RST though, but then again if you want something slightly easier to drive hard, then I can see your point.
Old 10-12-2011, 04:04 PM
  #23  
danny-boy
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
 
danny-boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: beaminster, dorset
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yeah the rs turbo is definately a bit more fun purely because it has a turbo! but right now i live away from home for 8 months of the year so i cant have all my tools to fix a car when im away, so the rs1800 ticks all the boxes for me at this time. dont get me wrong i'd be happy as larry if i had an rs turbo, but in my opinion the rs1800 is still a brilliant little car and definately still deserves the rs badge.
Old 21-12-2011, 06:01 AM
  #24  
wildheart
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (4)
 
wildheart's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,108
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I've owned 2 frst's and 4 fiesta RS1800's (still have 3 now) and the 1800's are much better cars to live with,especialy the later ones with power steering,better handling and the wingbacks are far more comfortable on long journeys.
Old 21-12-2011, 06:17 AM
  #25  
Glenn_
Glennvestite
iTrader: (1)
 
Glenn_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Darlington county durham
Posts: 62,755
Received 1,042 Likes on 996 Posts
Default

Ive got nothing against them. I like them.I bet they go ok too. Most old fords bloody rust unfortunatly. The fords thay dont rust are the ones that dont get used.

The mk 3.5 fiestas haf a petrol flap and different door mirrors.
Old 28-12-2011, 12:07 PM
  #26  
zippyobrien
PassionFord Post Whore!!
iTrader: (2)
 
zippyobrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: reading
Posts: 3,962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Only people who havent owned one will have a bad opinion. Same as mk5 rs2000.

I've had a turbo and a 1800 and would choose the 1800 all day long. Especially on track. Mine was a 3.5 and handled so much better. Rev limited removed and a light head port and it flew.
Old 29-12-2011, 08:06 PM
  #27  
Rex Kramer
Danger Seeker
iTrader: (1)
 
Rex Kramer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cleveland RSOC
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not got anything against them. I'm about to start getting mine ready for track next year.
Old 02-01-2012, 04:02 PM
  #28  
mk1trb
Boost Junkie
 
mk1trb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i like em, great little cars. mk3.5 were better being a little better built and had better mirrors and the tigger wing backs. i had 2 rs18's and 2 2i16v's there great if you love fez turbos but something you can use everyday without worrying about it starting or bloewing up. jsut turbo the zetec and have something quicker than a frst and didnt luca's fiesta start as a rs1800?
Old 03-01-2012, 07:54 AM
  #29  
Jur
15000
 
Jur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Holland / The Netherlands
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just for the books.
Here in Holland, we didn't have the RS1800, but the same fiesta was badged as XR2i 16v over here (with the 130BHP engine)
The 105BHP 1.8 16v was in a fiesta, but only badged as "S", and was pretty bare ("XR2i 8v seats, no side skirts/wheel arch extentions) standard (but painted) mirrors and bumpers .. and rectangle fogs underneath.

Enginewise, nothing wrong with the 1.8 16v (either 105 or 130BHP) but lacked the torque the FRST has.... but better for daily driving.

I'm pretty sure the additional power steering etc was a huge inprovement, but not much was improved compared to the 2i 8v and the FRST.

The later spec ones (mk3.5) had a fuel-cap-door in stead of a fuel cap, but rusted as hard as the mk3 ones, but this was covered by the fuel-cap-door

There are some more design flaws in the mk3, which they haven't solved in the mk3.5.. all related to rust... just to name a few:

- water disposal holes of the bulkhead .. dripped water ONTO a weld .. which was welded inside out (the lower plate was on top of the upper plate .. it was sealed off, but still water and dirt remained on the seal.. causing it to stay wet all the times, creating a hole inside the wheelarch @ hight of the side repeater.

- seat mounting points .. they stick out, catch dirt, stays wet.. rusts...
- wheel arches.. no comment
- Battery tray, and the beam below.. always trouble..
- around front windshield.. They placed some tape on the corners.. in stead of paying some attention on closing off the welds
- door-rubber ... is open to water, tends to rust .. drips on the not very well welded panels.. which start to rust too.

But in all.. the RS1800's . or XR2i 16v's as they were sold like here (without the recaro's )-: ) are pretty nifty cars.. and great runabouts (-:
The following users liked this post:
T_buntz (14-04-2020)
Old 15-02-2012, 02:47 PM
  #30  
BigJim19
COS i'm WORTH it
 
BigJim19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: lost...............!
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RSTAaron


A non rotten RS1800...

Shame I have to sell it.

whats the specs on them comps dude?
Old 18-02-2012, 02:16 PM
  #31  
marvin
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
 
marvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South West
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Each to their own really.....we all have our opinions likes and dislikes........

I have a prize winning 93 XR2i Mk3 1800 completely standard and 78k on the clock - never been welded.
And a 95 RS1800 Mk3.5 (Diff mirrors, seats (to Mk3 RS18) power steering, immobiliser and floor pan amoungst other bits to a Mk3) yep its rusty but not a lot - 110k.

Their nippy lil Fords....

But both are fun in their own way.....what more does one want?
The following users liked this post:
AndyMc22 (26-05-2022)
Old 20-02-2012, 01:19 AM
  #32  
Maxwell
Irregular Poster
 
Maxwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,602
Received 28 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

My friend has a mk3 K reg radiant red rs1800 and a mk3.5 N reg Diamond white rs1800. So definately made them in both formats!!

He also has a 90 frst 1.8zvh in rad red and a 1994 Si 2.1 zetec turbo in imperial blue. He still prefers his rad red frst 1.8zvh out of them all!!
Old 24-02-2012, 12:04 AM
  #33  
lozi
My Cossie Ate My Money
 
lozi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Northants
Posts: 1,807
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

After reading this thread I'm thinking a mk3.5 rs1800 with a turbo is the ideal combination!
Old 24-02-2012, 04:20 PM
  #34  
Brendan
struggling with reality
iTrader: (1)
 
Brendan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Salford
Posts: 1,692
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Think what you want it work and get a good engine builder to suggest somthing that will fit wat YOU want! It might be torque over power, for acceleration arround the wigglly bits, out and out power for top end! remember its going to be your TOY so build it to do what you want!
Old 20-04-2012, 11:19 PM
  #35  
Nismo
I'm Finding My Feet Here Now
 
Nismo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: U.K.
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Engines are dead. Get one then Puma it.
Old 21-06-2012, 03:33 AM
  #36  
jonyb4
15000
 
jonyb4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Port talbot, south wales
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 1.9 xr2 on 40's
its a 2i with 20 more nags, they only made 500ish and they all rotten like a pear


they are just not that good a car and came when ford pretty much gave up with 'fast'

i would like to own a minter with the recaros and split pokes but they are all gone and any mk3 fiesta with plactic over teh arches is hiding something very bad

if they put a turbo on that zetec it would have been historic


you are a moron...

how the hell can you say ford had given up with fast in 1992, the sierra cosworth only just finished production before the RS1800, and ford were well underway producing hemolagation RS cosworth escorts...


its showing that ford could produce a pokey N/A engine that WAS relible and lasted longer on less breakdowns and mishaps

they made far more than 500ish too


i have a Rs1800 spec engine in my fiesta and at 22 it certainly entertains me, if you dont mind the 33mpg and having to get it up to 3k rpm a RS1800 would make a awesome enjoyable daily/weekend car


oh also since you slated its power... 3bhp less than the RS turbo of the time
Old 21-06-2012, 01:25 PM
  #37  
jayh2379
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
 
jayh2379's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: croydon
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my old rot box ,loved every minute of owning this!!!

Name:  055.jpg
Views: 3531
Size:  295.4 KB
Old 17-07-2012, 08:55 PM
  #38  
frsjon
Advanced PassionFord User
 
frsjon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ISLE OF WIGHT
Posts: 1,548
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

wow how did i miss this lol rs1800's are a rare car these days. nearly all have major rust issues(even the red one on black comps in this thread)my old car! until i spent far too much money sorting it lol)
some of the best fiestas out there are rs1800's( luca's,mine lol)
just to answer a few posts above.. the red one on black comps above as mentioned is a mk3.5 on a m plate for anyone who thought they were all mk3's
and the comps were 7.5x16s..
The following users liked this post:
AndyMc22 (26-05-2022)
Old 17-07-2012, 08:58 PM
  #39  
RstAaron.
I've found that life I needed.. It's HERE!!
 
RstAaron.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Norwich
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Shame I think it's no more mate...
Old 17-07-2012, 09:01 PM
  #40  
frsjon
Advanced PassionFord User
 
frsjon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ISLE OF WIGHT
Posts: 1,548
Received 19 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RstAaron.
Shame I think it's no more mate...
really? so it sold? crashed or stripped?


Quick Reply: whats everyone got against the rs1800?



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:15 PM.