General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Had my cossie on the rollers at the weekend...

Old 30-11-2016, 10:11 PM
  #41  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ridgey
You loose a lot more power percentage than that through the drive train.
Was that for me or Steve 4i?

What do you think the losses should be through the transmission?

Cheers Paul
Old 30-11-2016, 10:18 PM
  #42  
Rick
15K+ Super Poster!!

 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
Posts: 15,885
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

It's a very narrow power band. Only revving to around 6700 too. Have you checked for boost leaks? It appears very lazy for GT30 turbo, but is good power for a GT30. I would pressure test to ensure you are not losing boost.

Rick
Old 30-11-2016, 10:33 PM
  #43  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rick
It's a very narrow power band. Only revving to around 6700 too. Have you checked for boost leaks? It appears very lazy for GT30 turbo, but is good power for a GT30. I would pressure test to ensure you are not losing boost.

Rick
I am not losing boost, but your right it is a lazy gt30.
It's not a narrow powerband really.... it revs to over 8k, it's just the RR operator stopped the graph at peak power....

Cheers Paul
Old 30-11-2016, 10:34 PM
  #44  
Adam-M
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Adam-M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 3,120
Received 315 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

Can anyone explain to me how a modern ecu will make an engine spool up faster than it would with say an L8/P8 that's been live mapped? Whats the difference? I thought these new ecus where more about adding safety features I didn't think they actually helped performance?

Assuming the L8 was running wasted spark and had a new loom ect.
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (30-11-2016)
Old 30-11-2016, 10:50 PM
  #45  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adam-M
Can anyone explain to me how a modern ecu will make an engine spool up faster than it would with say an L8/P8 that's been live mapped? Whats the difference? I thought these new ecus where more about adding safety features I didn't think they actually helped performance?

Assuming the L8 was running wasted spark and had a new loom ect.
Exactly mate, they don't.

My engine management is in good shape, so I see no reason to change it.
Sure it's a good mod if you can afford it or warrant changing it but otherwise what's the point?

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 07:39 AM
  #46  
Rod-Tarry
Happily retired
 
Rod-Tarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 7,707
Received 237 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
Exactly mate, they don't.

My engine management is in good shape, so I see no reason to change it.
Sure it's a good mod if you can afford it or warrant changing it but otherwise what's the point?

Cheers Paul
There lies your problem you aint got a clue fella. Just enjoy you car whatever you build but if you think its going to compare with a latest Spec car your a dreamer. Just look at that Graph its about the worst ive ever seen. When the owners of the two Fastest Cossies there have ever been tell you its bad perhaps fella you should listen.
Old 01-12-2016, 08:10 AM
  #47  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adam-M
Can anyone explain to me how a modern ecu will make an engine spool up faster than it would with say an L8/P8 that's been live mapped? Whats the difference? I thought these new ecus where more about adding safety features I didn't think they actually helped performance?

Assuming the L8 was running wasted spark and had a new loom ect.
I am sure Mark Shead can give a more informed answer but in my very basic knowledge....Turbo engines go wrong very quickly when they go wrong so more safety features allow you to run more closely to the envelope with more being checked and controlled. I also believe things like boost control, coil on plug, types of injector all play a big part and I understand that the ECU can do things faster and with more parameters...I could be wrong on all this.
Old 01-12-2016, 08:20 AM
  #48  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,912
Received 258 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adam-M
Can anyone explain to me how a modern ecu will make an engine spool up faster than it would with say an L8/P8 that's been live mapped? Whats the difference? I thought these new ecus where more about adding safety features I didn't think they actually helped performance?

Assuming the L8 was running wasted spark and had a new loom ect.
That depends largely on how your boost control is configured and what any controller allows you to do.

And a better ecu will give better performance and safety all round....as long as it is tuned correctly. They'll offer better resolution and allow you to run things more precisely to get the most from it.
The following users liked this post:
Caddyshack (01-12-2016)
Old 01-12-2016, 08:22 AM
  #49  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rod-Tarry
There lies your problem you aint got a clue fella. Just enjoy you car whatever you build but if you think its going to compare with a latest Spec car your a dreamer. Just look at that Graph its about the worst ive ever seen. When the owners of the two Fastest Cossies there have ever been tell you its bad perhaps fella you should listen.
I do enjoy my car, and it's a hoot to drive, I wasn't trying to compare is to one of the latest spec cars??

What's so bad about the graph? Besides the late power delivery?

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 08:28 AM
  #50  
cossynut2
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
cossynut2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Holbury,Southampton
Posts: 4,562
Received 393 Likes on 358 Posts
Default

turbotrev, unfortunately when a post like yours comes up you will get a lot of negative comments. It sounds like you have the basics for a powerful car but maybe you havent had the best advice on how to achieve it. There are a lot of very knowledgeable Cosworth engine tuners who know their stuff who could perhaps help you with your future upgrades to get the most out of it.
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (01-12-2016)
Old 01-12-2016, 08:36 AM
  #51  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,912
Received 258 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
I do enjoy my car, and it's a hoot to drive, I wasn't trying to compare is to one of the latest spec cars??

What's so bad about the graph? Besides the late power delivery?

Cheers Paul
A power graph only tells so much....graphs can vary from day to day, dyno to dyno etc etc. That's why often it's best just not to bother.

Use them as they are intended, as a tuning tool. Before/after gains whilst tuning.

The main concern would be the late power delivery, it just seems like a lot for ultimately a fairly modest big number. I'm sure many would expect a car with that power to spool a bit faster. But as with everything, there are many variables.

If the car drives well, goes as hard as you want it....never worry about what others think. But when you post graphs, expect both positive and negative ( or real ) comments.

Same would happen with posting any such data.

It could be worse....you could post about building bits of your car using drain and sewage pipes from B&Q....wonder how that might go ? lol
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (01-12-2016)
Old 01-12-2016, 08:41 AM
  #52  
cos elle
Part of the Furniture
 
cos elle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

What gt30 turbo is it mate
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (01-12-2016)
Old 01-12-2016, 09:28 AM
  #53  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cossynut2
turbotrev, unfortunately when a post like yours comes up you will get a lot of negative comments. It sounds like you have the basics for a powerful car but maybe you havent had the best advice on how to achieve it. There are a lot of very knowledgeable Cosworth engine tuners who know their stuff who could perhaps help you with your future upgrades to get the most out of it.
I noticed! Ha ha.

I new I'd get all sorts of comments good and bad, I take on board any comments.

I'll await replies from the real negatives ones, if people have and opinion I'd like to know the reasons behind it such as Martins comment.

I do have dealings with a decent tuner but have not mentioned that yet as to keep things turning into turner wars again....
Although I'm guessing some people have noticed already....

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 09:45 AM
  #54  
cossynut2
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
cossynut2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Holbury,Southampton
Posts: 4,562
Received 393 Likes on 358 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
I noticed! Ha ha.

I new I'd get all sorts of comments good and bad, I take on board any comments.

I'll await replies from the real negatives ones, if people have and opinion I'd like to know the reasons behind it such as Martins comment.

I do have dealings with a decent tuner but have not mentioned that yet as to keep things turning into turner wars again....
Although I'm guessing some people have noticed already....

Cheers Paul
Thats why I didnt put names to the tuners as that could open a whole new can of worms!!
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (01-12-2016)
Old 01-12-2016, 09:57 AM
  #55  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
I noticed! Ha ha.

I new I'd get all sorts of comments good and bad, I take on board any comments.

I'll await replies from the real negatives ones, if people have and opinion I'd like to know the reasons behind it such as Martins comment.

I do have dealings with a decent tuner but have not mentioned that yet as to keep things turning into turner wars again....
Although I'm guessing some people have noticed already....

Cheers Paul
The graph looks like the engine spec is aimed at max power and if that's how you like it that's fine.
The way I spec stuff is I would rather loose 20hp and pick up 60ftlb and that also brings in the response earlier.
As far as aftermarket goes tech it shouldn't make more but it does. Play old school Atari and then PS4 this is the diff in knowledge and spec of the ecu diff you currently have to the new type aftermarket.

Mark
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (01-12-2016)
Old 01-12-2016, 10:02 AM
  #56  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cos elle
What gt30 turbo is it mate
This is the other thing... I bought this car a few years back because it had a lot of the main parts I was gonna need anyway, 200 block, supra diff, modded head etc. It was originally built by Joe Stevens at Bluesprint.
This turbo was already fitted to the engine and I've just left it on there for these past few years while I've sorted out the car in other areas, hence the engine being ready for more power which I was the route I was always go go down eventually.

It's a gt30 hybrid with a bigger compressor wheel than normal and a billet wheel, roller bearing core and a .82 exh housing, that's all I know....

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 10:04 AM
  #57  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cossynut2
Thats why I didnt put names to the tuners as that could open a whole new can of worms!!
Bring on the worms, debating is good! Ha ha.

Wether I choose to listen to people or go ahead and do my own thing anyway it will always make a good discussion I guess lol

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 10:10 AM
  #58  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
The graph looks like the engine spec is aimed at max power and if that's how you like it that's fine.
The way I spec stuff is I would rather loose 20hp and pick up 60ftlb and that also brings in the response earlier.
As far as aftermarket goes tech it shouldn't make more but it does. Play old school Atari and then PS4 this is the diff in knowledge and spec of the ecu diff you currently have to the new type aftermarket.

Mark
I guess in a way that is what I'm after...??

I don't need a car that drives with super low lag and that I can accelerate with when in 5th gear at 65mph, it's a fun car that gets used for the few thousand miles or so a year that I do in it.

A while back I did debate dropping down a turbo size possibly to a smaller better specced gt30 but it would never do more than about 500hp so I decided that's not what I wanna do as I want more power.

It would be less laggy and a better 'road car' in that respect but it's not what I'm after.

I want something frightening.

Cheers Paul

Last edited by turbotrev; 01-12-2016 at 10:12 AM. Reason: Spelling
Old 01-12-2016, 10:10 AM
  #59  
Jay,
Sponsor



iTrader: (4)
 
Jay,'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: south east
Posts: 25,222
Received 407 Likes on 329 Posts
Default

With Ecus the webber ecu has iirc a l6 has a 8x8 table and the l8 a 12x12 table now when you are mapping for big boost big power you are basicly spreading each load site a long way to achieve the fueling and timing you require .Now a modern aftermarket ecu will have at least 32x32 table .Now until recently the algorithms were not the clever in past aftermarket ecus compared to the oem ecu as for old tech the l6/l8 were brilliant on throttle transients and multiplexers are what makes it possible to widen the load sites as mentioned earlier but now modern ecus are very well done with great software so the first thing I noticed the car started cleaner on my link ecu then also felt crisper more responsive and fueled so much better than my l8 .

Now my change of ecu was done with a identical spec engine so i could log and compare the data at the time and the differemce was not only night and day in the data but the drive felt so much better and more modern and couple that with all the other controls I.E Knock control boost control ect its a no brainer
Old 01-12-2016, 10:13 AM
  #60  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
The graph looks like the engine spec is aimed at max power and if that's how you like it that's fine.
The way I spec stuff is I would rather loose 20hp and pick up 60ftlb and that also brings in the response earlier.
As far as aftermarket goes tech it shouldn't make more but it does. Play old school Atari and then PS4 this is the diff in knowledge and spec of the ecu diff you currently have to the new type aftermarket.

Mark
Do you say that because it makes its power so far up the Rev range?

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 10:16 AM
  #61  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
Do you say that because it makes its power so far up the Rev range?

Cheers Paul
It's the very late nature of the tq band that kills if for a road car for me.

Mark
Old 01-12-2016, 10:33 AM
  #62  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jay,
With Ecus the webber ecu has iirc a l6 has a 8x8 table and the l8 a 12x12 table now when you are mapping for big boost big power you are basicly spreading each load site a long way to achieve the fueling and timing you require .Now a modern aftermarket ecu will have at least 32x32 table .Now until recently the algorithms were not the clever in past aftermarket ecus compared to the oem ecu as for old tech the l6/l8 were brilliant on throttle transients and multiplexers are what makes it possible to widen the load sites as mentioned earlier but now modern ecus are very well done with great software so the first thing I noticed the car started cleaner on my link ecu then also felt crisper more responsive and fueled so much better than my l8 .

Now my change of ecu was done with a identical spec engine so i could log and compare the data at the time and the differemce was not only night and day in the data but the drive felt so much better and more modern and couple that with all the other controls I.E Knock control boost control ect its a no brainer
I do understand what your saying and mostly agree.
I am happy with the way my car drives i.e. Part throttle, cold start, fuel economy, etc.

And if it's doing it's job and I'm happy with it then it will stay until I feel the need to spend 2k plus on upgrading

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 10:36 AM
  #63  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
It's the very late nature of the tq band that kills if for a road car for me.

Mark
But this would change if a different turbo was fitted be it a Garrett, efr, etc....

Like I said before I have nitrous fitted as well to spool the turbo up so it does make power from 3k upwards.

I may even try and get a power run somewhere with using the nitrous just to see the graph.

So in a way I'm guessing that's kinda how an efr responds with such good low down torque??

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 10:38 AM
  #64  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
I do understand what your saying and mostly agree.
I am happy with the way my car drives i.e. Part throttle, cold start, fuel economy, etc.

And if it's doing it's job and I'm happy with it then it will stay until I feel the need to spend 2k plus on upgrading

Cheers Paul
It's more than 2k😂 Wait until you drive a car with one on as its then you notice your car wasn't quite as good as you thought lol.

Mark
Old 01-12-2016, 10:41 AM
  #65  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
But this would change if a different turbo was fitted be it a Garrett, efr, etc....

Like I said before I have nitrous fitted as well to spool the turbo up so it does make power from 3k upwards.

I may even try and get a power run somewhere with using the nitrous just to see the graph.

So in a way I'm guessing that's kinda how an efr responds with such good low down torque??

Cheers Paul
You are still at the mercy of your engine spec. So a correctly specced set up will work but it won't be as good as it could but that may not matter if it gives you what you are after.

Mark
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (01-12-2016)
Old 01-12-2016, 10:48 AM
  #66  
Jay,
Sponsor



iTrader: (4)
 
Jay,'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: south east
Posts: 25,222
Received 407 Likes on 329 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
It's more than 2k😂 Wait until you drive a car with one on as its then you notice your car wasn't quite as good as you thought lol.

Mark
When i get mine over to you and get it finished he can drive mine
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (01-12-2016)
Old 01-12-2016, 10:50 AM
  #67  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jay,
When i get mine over to you and get it finished he can drive mine
Anytime just call. Building cars and engines so can move stuff easily

Mark
Old 01-12-2016, 10:54 AM
  #68  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
It's more than 2k😂 Wait until you drive a car with one on as its then you notice your car wasn't quite as good as you thought lol.

Mark
More than 2k ha ha,

This is the thing, I do want to go in one/drive one.

I'm not saying my car is the best by any means, and I've no doubt newer tech is gonna be better

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 10:55 AM
  #69  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
You are still at the mercy of your engine spec. So a correctly specced set up will work but it won't be as good as it could but that may not matter if it gives you what you are after.

Mark
Oh 100% mate

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 10:56 AM
  #70  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jay,
When i get mine over to you and get it finished he can drive mine
I thought yours was finished buddy??

I appreciate the offer Jay 👍🏻

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 10:57 AM
  #71  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

You on a 7064?

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 11:03 AM
  #72  
Jay,
Sponsor



iTrader: (4)
 
Jay,'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: south east
Posts: 25,222
Received 407 Likes on 329 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
I thought yours was finished buddy??

I appreciate the offer Jay 👍🏻

Cheers Paul
Just needs the mapping finished

Originally Posted by turbotrev
You on a 7064?

Cheers Paul
Yes Bud
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (01-12-2016)
Old 01-12-2016, 11:32 AM
  #73  
Adam-M
PassionFord Post Troll
 
Adam-M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Scotland
Posts: 3,120
Received 315 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

Cheers for the explanation Jay, having knock control would be a great advantage aswell as the ecu properly control the boost.

See on an efr you have the blow off valve built in and a boost solenoid, where does the electrical connector for the solenoid go? Would it need connecting to the old Amal valve wiring or does it need an aftermarket ecu to use this feature?
Old 01-12-2016, 11:41 AM
  #74  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

I will put my at the wheels hub graph up later that I had done about 6 months ago.

That'll really feed the haters, lol

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 11:48 AM
  #75  
3doorcozmess
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
3doorcozmess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: sutton surrey
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

I'm also going 7064 on sm4 which I hope is classed a modem as the sm4 could be classed as old tech now.

my engine is done just need to get it in the bay and over to MAD.

Maybe we should sort out a proper RR day next year old vs new and get it featured?

seems like the mags don't do this any more unless you have a focus of fiesta.

Jay I don't know you but you seem like the guy to sort it out lol.
Old 01-12-2016, 11:55 AM
  #76  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Def modern tech mate, more modern than my old level 8 setup anyway ha ha

Cheers Paul
Old 01-12-2016, 12:36 PM
  #77  
Jay,
Sponsor



iTrader: (4)
 
Jay,'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: south east
Posts: 25,222
Received 407 Likes on 329 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Adam-M
Cheers for the explanation Jay, having knock control would be a great advantage aswell as the ecu properly control the boost.

See on an efr you have the blow off valve built in and a boost solenoid, where does the electrical connector for the solenoid go? Would it need connecting to the old Amal valve wiring or does it need an aftermarket ecu to use this feature?

Im using the recirc valve on the turbo and plumbed in as a standard one IE to the inlet and not using the control valve as we already fitted a mac valve on the new loom so there was no point changing it
Old 01-12-2016, 12:57 PM
  #78  
Cossie Sammins
BANNED
BANNED
 
Cossie Sammins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Slough, Berkshire
Posts: 22
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All these people who think they need a custom or new ecu, think on this -

The RS500 had a basic ecu and when tuned even with that ecu, could make 500 bhp.

New ecu's are all about refinement and ease of access

Last edited by Cossie Sammins; 01-12-2016 at 12:58 PM.
Old 01-12-2016, 01:02 PM
  #79  
Jay,
Sponsor



iTrader: (4)
 
Jay,'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: south east
Posts: 25,222
Received 407 Likes on 329 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cossie Sammins
All these people who think they need a custom or new ecu, think on this -

The RS500 had a basic ecu and when tuned even with that ecu, could make 500 bhp.

New ecu's are all about refinement and ease of access
Thats right with low comp slow injectors and even slower spooling turbos . Just because it works dont make it better
Old 01-12-2016, 01:07 PM
  #80  
R4N SS
Professional Waffler
iTrader: (6)
 
R4N SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: ?
Posts: 27,161
Received 147 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

My saph had a GT3076r with a 0.62 housing and it was laggy as hell. Showed a similar graph plot to Turbotrev and it was horrible to drive on the road - literally nothing until 4500rpm and then it all comes in with a bang - could not drive that car quick or hard as it would just break traction everywhere when the boost comes in.

This was on aftermarket management too so its not just that but the whole spec

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:31 PM.