General Car Related Discussion. To discuss anything that is related to cars and automotive technology that doesnt naturally fit into another forum catagory.

Performance/ quarter mile times of cossies with efr turbos...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21-04-2015, 06:53 AM
  #41  
3doorcozmess
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
3doorcozmess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: sutton surrey
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stu @ M Developments
I have this discussion quite a lot with customers looking for different turbos so understand where the fella is confused and understand what he is looking for. The question seems to be - if you already own a 420bhp .63 T34 car and fit a comparable EFR turbo in the hope of setting it also to 420bhp, will the car be faster?

As I'm lying in bed it's hard to show the difference visually without Dyno graphs but think of it this way.
A turbo just makes a small engine into a big one, and it does that with pressurised air, so the faster it delivers the air, the faster you get a bigger engine. At idle, the YB is a 2 litre. A good one, at 15psi is closer to a 4 litre. The faster you can get that 15psi, the quicker you have the 4 litre engine.

The EFR's SPOOL is better, so it will feed the engine with the boost faster than a T series. Also, the engines response time between you changing your foot from power fully off, to power fully on will be greatly reduced with a faster spooling turbo, so regardless of final power being the same, the EFR will deliver it sooner when asked as it can go from zero to say, 40psi faster than any T series.

Secondly, as spool is much improved, your torque band should move left as the engines getting bigger, faster, thus giving you more useable torque area UNDER THE GRAPH. As an example, the T34.63 tends to make peak boost on the Dyno, when floored at 2000rpm, by around 4000rpm. An EFR will deliver the same amount of air by around 3500rpm. This is because the EFR turbo requires less energy to rotate it so it rotates up to the required speed faster. for any engine driven in this lower engine speed area, the car WILL be faster than a comparable T series equipped car driven at the same speed in the same gear. IE: 70mph roll on in 5th gear side by side.

That's why folk are saying ignore drag strips, as that's about top end power and most turbos here will be equal, as BHP is BHP. Once your out of first gear, a drag car never sees low engine speeds or has worries about spool times as it's just wide open throttle and high revs all the way. That is NOT a test of a turbos responsiveness, it's only a test of is ability to flow air with its wastegate opening and open. A road car turbo test is all about what it does with the wastegate shut. Two very different metrics.
Cheers Stuart great explanation.

Out of interest have you mapped many efr turbo if so are there any graphs posted on your youtube page
Old 21-04-2015, 07:42 AM
  #42  
3doorcozmess
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
 
3doorcozmess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: sutton surrey
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 21 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

sorry double post

Last edited by 3doorcozmess; 21-04-2015 at 07:43 AM.
Old 21-04-2015, 08:37 AM
  #43  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
I have tested a gtx3071 against a 7064 and at 3800rpm the Efr was making 500ftlb and the gtx was 175ftlb. With that diff why would you ever want to fit another gtx turbo. The same goes for the rest of the range I have tested.

Mark
Totally get that Mark.
What was the gtx making at say 7000 revs compared to the efr? More? Less?
Do you have a graph of each to show?

Cheers Paul
Old 21-04-2015, 08:52 AM
  #44  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
Totally get that Mark.
What was the gtx making at say 7000 revs compared to the efr? More? Less?
Do you have a graph of each to show?

Cheers Paul
From mem within 3hp. I can't post graphs on here as I can be seen as trading.

Mark
Old 21-04-2015, 09:27 AM
  #45  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Sorry I meant torque not hp, at say 7k?
You really not allowed to post graphs?
Well I never knew that

Cheers Paul
Old 21-04-2015, 09:44 AM
  #46  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
Sorry I meant torque not hp, at say 7k?
You really not allowed to post graphs?
Well I never knew that

Cheers Paul
Hp is tq so it's within the calc.

Mark
Old 21-04-2015, 09:54 AM
  #47  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Er ok, I don't get that, bit over my head but thanks anyway lol

So where are all these efr powered cossies?
Anybody using em rather than just sitting them on stands?

Cheers Paul
Old 21-04-2015, 10:01 AM
  #48  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
Er ok, I don't get that, bit over my head but thanks anyway lol

So where are all these efr powered cossies?
Anybody using em rather than just sitting them on stands?

Cheers Paul
Hp *5250 divided by rpm =tq.

Mark
Old 21-04-2015, 10:11 AM
  #49  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

I've heard that calculation mentioned before but I'm not gonna lie I don't fully understand it.
If you was to look at the graphs on the car you tested when you went from gtx to efr I understand it's making torque sooner and lower down the revs but higher up say 6-7k what was the difference (if any) at the torque figure there?
(If that makes sense?)

Cheers Paul
Old 21-04-2015, 10:19 AM
  #50  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
I've heard that calculation mentioned before but I'm not gonna lie I don't fully understand it.
If you was to look at the graphs on the car you tested when you went from gtx to efr I understand it's making torque sooner and lower down the revs but higher up say 6-7k what was the difference (if any) at the torque figure there?
(If that makes sense?)

Cheers Paul
If they are making the same power at the same rpm they are the same.

Mark
Old 21-04-2015, 10:21 AM
  #51  
jontysafe
PassionFord Regular
 
jontysafe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Marlborough
Posts: 469
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I'm currently having built a new spec engine as follows:

Intelligently ported head, not going mad on exh ports
Bd16+ in, Bd14 exh
Long rods, forged pocketed short Pistons
8.2:1 CR
Possibly solid lifters??
Custom twin scroll manifold
EFR7163 internal gate
Motec M400
1000cc injectors
Boost mapped to road speed

This is coming from a Gt30 set up so will be interesting to see the differences when done
All going in a shonky Westfield!!
Old 21-04-2015, 10:39 AM
  #52  
jontysafe
PassionFord Regular
 
jontysafe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Marlborough
Posts: 469
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jontysafe
I'm currently having built a new spec engine as follows:

Intelligently ported head, not going mad on exh ports
Bd16+ in, Bd14 exh
Long rods, forged pocketed short Pistons
8.2:1 CR
Possibly solid lifters??
Custom twin scroll manifold
EFR7163 internal gate
Motec M400
1000cc injectors
Boost mapped to road speed

This is coming from a Gt30 set up so will be interesting to see the differences when done
All going in a shonky Westfield!!
May also go same direction as Rod on intake system from Jenvey.
Old 21-04-2015, 11:31 AM
  #53  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
If they are making the same power at the same rpm they are the same.

Mark
So if the efr is making more torque and sooner than say the gtx is does it also hold on to that power as long as the gtx would?
High up in the revs?

Cheers Paul
Old 21-04-2015, 11:32 AM
  #54  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jontysafe
I'm currently having built a new spec engine as follows:

Intelligently ported head, not going mad on exh ports
Bd16+ in, Bd14 exh
Long rods, forged pocketed short Pistons
8.2:1 CR
Possibly solid lifters??
Custom twin scroll manifold
EFR7163 internal gate
Motec M400
1000cc injectors
Boost mapped to road speed

This is coming from a Gt30 set up so will be interesting to see the differences when done
All going in a shonky Westfield!!
That will be an interesting comparison.
Did you have all that internal engine work running with the gt30 setup as well though?

Cheers Paul
Old 21-04-2015, 12:19 PM
  #55  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
Sorry I meant torque not hp, at say 7k?
You really not allowed to post graphs?
Well I never knew that

Cheers Paul
So are you the type of guy happy to have 10ftlb more at 7k and 330ftlb less at 3.8k.

Mark
Old 21-04-2015, 12:33 PM
  #56  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
So are you the type of guy happy to have 10ftlb more at 7k and 330ftlb less at 3.8k.

Mark
No not all, if that's what's better then its the better turbo.
Just wondered if it's that good low down the revs is it sacrificing it from higher up in the rev range, that's all.
A mate of mine is looking to get this type of conversion done with yourself so I'm looking forward to seeing how his car drives/feels

Cheers Paul
Old 21-04-2015, 01:24 PM
  #57  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
No not all, if that's what's better then its the better turbo.
Just wondered if it's that good low down the revs is it sacrificing it from higher up in the rev range, that's all.
A mate of mine is looking to get this type of conversion done with yourself so I'm looking forward to seeing how his car drives/feels

Cheers Paul
It's about using the smallest turbo for the job. If you want it to hold above what a gt30 can do you either use the external gated version or use the 7670 both will massively out perform a gt30.
Then if I do one for him you will be in the perfect position to see what it's like without you spending the money. One thing is for sure you will be stunned at the diff I know I am every time I do one.

Mark
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (21-04-2015)
Old 21-04-2015, 01:50 PM
  #58  
Jay,
Sponsor



iTrader: (4)
 
Jay,'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: south east
Posts: 25,222
Received 407 Likes on 329 Posts
Default

Im sure it will be ok to put some graphs up as a technical discussion is great to see and learn from
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (21-04-2015)
Old 21-04-2015, 01:54 PM
  #59  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jay,
Im sure it will be ok to put some graphs up as a technical discussion is great to see and learn from
Will post it when I get home.

Mark
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (21-04-2015)
Old 21-04-2015, 02:10 PM
  #60  
stevieturbo
C**t
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 7,913
Received 258 Likes on 237 Posts
Default

Whilst not a cosworth, here is a write up comparing some.

http://blog.perrinperformance.com/bo...-tuned-part-2/
Old 21-04-2015, 03:09 PM
  #61  
jontysafe
PassionFord Regular
 
jontysafe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Marlborough
Posts: 469
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
That will be an interesting comparison.
Did you have all that internal engine work running with the gt30 setup as well though?

Cheers Paul
I had a lower comp ratio and larger ports. Am not number chasing and would be more than happy with 450bhp and great response. More important for me is some sort of semblance of reliability.
I also may add that I have a restricted budget like anyone else!

Last edited by jontysafe; 21-04-2015 at 03:13 PM.
Old 21-04-2015, 05:36 PM
  #62  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Ok here they are,
Stock engine with 7064 EFR
Name:  Pugdyno7064efr025_zpsce2a2d34.jpg
Views: 648
Size:  119.8 KB
7064 on my 500hp engine
Name:  johnefrwithexcam001_zpse8abaa2a.jpg
Views: 857
Size:  72.5 KB
Injectors were flat out on this so no extra effort was made to hold boost past 7k.

Mark
Old 21-04-2015, 05:42 PM
  #63  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Gtx3071 on my 500hp engine
Name:  uaecar_zpsae9ebe4f.jpg
Views: 794
Size:  160.0 KB

Mark
Old 21-04-2015, 05:43 PM
  #64  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Standard engine t34
Name:  RRSTescort002.jpg
Views: 620
Size:  99.7 KB

Mark
Old 21-04-2015, 05:46 PM
  #65  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

I wont post anymore graphs, This is just to show the diff between the EFR turbos and Garrett units on the same spec engines.

Mark
Old 21-04-2015, 05:50 PM
  #66  
gjh
10K+ Poster!!
 
gjh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: West Wales
Posts: 12,786
Received 347 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

That's hell of an improvement with the 7064! Must make it a far quicker car overall over twisty roads?
Old 21-04-2015, 06:10 PM
  #67  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gjh
That's hell of an improvement with the 7064! Must make it a far quicker car overall over twisty roads?
Yeah, I bet the owner is a good looking bloke too.
Old 21-04-2015, 06:12 PM
  #68  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

Have you got any long strokes with efr? The 500 bhp spec looks excellent on 7064
Old 21-04-2015, 06:16 PM
  #69  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Nice, cheers Mark.
So that given 100lbft more torque 1000 rpm sooner than the gt30.
I notice the gt30 graph has a flatter, more steady curve than the efr one?
Why such a drastic change in the torque curve but not the hp curve? (besides it going up earlier)

Cheers Paul
Old 21-04-2015, 06:32 PM
  #70  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

I think on my engine Mark was being kind to the setup, the intercooler was not anywhere near as good as a spec r one, the gear box was standard (smashed it up,in under 100 miles) and he was worried the head was lifting although it turned out that my header tank was lacking a breather.
Old 21-04-2015, 07:01 PM
  #71  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Is yours the 468hp one buddy?

Cheers Paul
Old 21-04-2015, 07:11 PM
  #72  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Caddyshack
Have you got any long strokes with efr? The 500 bhp spec looks excellent on 7064
None yet yours WILL be the first,
I am currently doing one with a 7670 and stroker.

Mark
Old 21-04-2015, 07:13 PM
  #73  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
Nice, cheers Mark.
So that given 100lbft more torque 1000 rpm sooner than the gt30.
I notice the gt30 graph has a flatter, more steady curve than the efr one?
Why such a drastic change in the torque curve but not the hp curve? (besides it going up earlier)

Cheers Paul
The EFR on the 500hp engine was running a touch more boost and the eff of the turbine and twin scroll brings up the tq quite a bit,
The GTX was on its surge limit and held more boost at the top.

Mark
Old 21-04-2015, 07:21 PM
  #74  
Caddyshack
10K+ Poster!!

 
Caddyshack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Guildford
Posts: 10,841
Received 1,031 Likes on 944 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
Is yours the 468hp one buddy?

Cheers Paul
Yup, standard engine.
Old 21-04-2015, 07:21 PM
  #75  
ajamesc
cossie fan (unluckerly)
 
ajamesc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: hampshire
Posts: 9,791
Received 435 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Shead
I have tested a gtx3071 against a 7064 and at 3800rpm the Efr was making 500ftlb and the gtx was 175ftlb. With that diff why would you ever want to fit another gtx turbo. The same goes for the rest of the range I have tested.

Mark
That is a very very impressive difference!
Old 21-04-2015, 07:28 PM
  #76  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

What boost were these on?
The stock engine and the 500hp one?
2bar ish?

Cheers Paul
Old 21-04-2015, 07:31 PM
  #77  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
What boost were these on?
The stock engine and the 500hp one?
2bar ish?

Cheers Paul
The 500hp one peaks at 2.5bar dropping to 1.7 and the 468hp peaks at 2.2bar dropping to 1.6bar.

Mark
Old 21-04-2015, 07:43 PM
  #78  
turbotrev
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
 
turbotrev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Sutton
Posts: 2,051
Received 89 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Cool thanks.
Is that why the power curves make their peak first off low down in the revs?
I'm guessing the curves decrease as the boost tails off?
Thanks for taking time to answer all these questions by the way!

Cheers Paul
Old 21-04-2015, 07:48 PM
  #79  
Mark Shead
PassionFord Post Whore!!
 
Mark Shead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Marlow Bucks
Posts: 5,472
Received 223 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by turbotrev
Cool thanks.
Is that why the power curves make their peak first off low down in the revs?
I'm guessing the curves decrease as the boost tails off?
Thanks for taking time to answer all these questions by the way!

Cheers Paul
The eff of the set up really does bring it in early and gives a fat TQ curve,
You can turn the EFR down to match the GTX but you cant turn the GTX up as that is all it can give.

Mark
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (21-04-2015)
Old 21-04-2015, 08:15 PM
  #80  
AiToR51
Wahay!! I've lost my Virginity!!
 
AiToR51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Spain
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

didn't you tried a BW S200 turbo? as I've read that is not as good as a EFR but as it has twin scroll T3 could be used with 2wd manifold and it's way cheaper


Quick Reply: Performance/ quarter mile times of cossies with efr turbos...



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:59 PM.