Performance/ quarter mile times of cossies with efr turbos...
#121
10K+ Poster!!
#123
PassionFord Regular
I'm perhaps not the best exponent of the GT series as I'm going efr. As far as I can see no one has tried the EFR7163 mixed flow turbine yet so that's the way I'm going.
I have to say though I loved the way my car drove on the gt3076.
I have to say though I loved the way my car drove on the gt3076.
#127
PassionFord Regular
I have been brought up not to discuss money/cost but think it might add something to the post.
So far:
Efr7163 int gate t4 £1100 (sold my GT30 for £600
100mm 2nd hand Airtec intercooler £100
Motec m400 inc can to USB cable, 512k data logging and lambda £1000 sold my L8 for £300
I think whatever way you skin the pudding the manifold is circa £800-£900
I have no doubt that a new loom will leave little change from £500
1000cc injectors circa £400 (sold my Siemens inj and chip for £300)
Mapping I don't know yet
So far:
Efr7163 int gate t4 £1100 (sold my GT30 for £600
100mm 2nd hand Airtec intercooler £100
Motec m400 inc can to USB cable, 512k data logging and lambda £1000 sold my L8 for £300
I think whatever way you skin the pudding the manifold is circa £800-£900
I have no doubt that a new loom will leave little change from £500
1000cc injectors circa £400 (sold my Siemens inj and chip for £300)
Mapping I don't know yet
#129
PassionFord Regular
Saying that I don't plan to push mine much past 1.8-1.9 bar because Westfields are a pain in the arse
Last edited by jontysafe; 24-04-2015 at 06:55 PM.
#130
Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
I have been brought up not to discuss money/cost but think it might add something to the post.
So far:
Efr7163 int gate t4 £1100 (sold my GT30 for £600
100mm 2nd hand Airtec intercooler £100
Motec m400 inc can to USB cable, 512k data logging and lambda £1000 sold my L8 for £300
I think whatever way you skin the pudding the manifold is circa £800-£900
I have no doubt that a new loom will leave little change from £500
1000cc injectors circa £400 (sold my Siemens inj and chip for £300)
Mapping I don't know yet
So far:
Efr7163 int gate t4 £1100 (sold my GT30 for £600
100mm 2nd hand Airtec intercooler £100
Motec m400 inc can to USB cable, 512k data logging and lambda £1000 sold my L8 for £300
I think whatever way you skin the pudding the manifold is circa £800-£900
I have no doubt that a new loom will leave little change from £500
1000cc injectors circa £400 (sold my Siemens inj and chip for £300)
Mapping I don't know yet
Ok well seeing as the 7064 will do what i need but i just thought i would ask lol
#131
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
My mind may change once I see more/go out in/drive an efr equipped car but time will tell
Cheers Paul
#132
Happily retired
That's fine if you are happy why change.
#133
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
#134
PassionFord Regular
#135
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
#139
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
1) We mapped it both times.
2) NOTHING else was changed.
The car (A Sierra Cosworth -781, stdhead-16/14) originally had a GT3071 and while it went well and made over 500bhp, the owner wasnt happen with its responce times.
He went away and eventually changed to one of Marks awesome manifolds and the EFR7064 and brought it back for mapping again.
The torque and boost curves tell the story just fine.
Yes, the GT went on to make more power, but its response was rubbish (In comparison) and the owner was specifically NOT chasing figures.
He wanted responsiveness and driveability above all else. We chose to run this turbo nice and easy at just 28psi falling to 25 at top end, where as the GT3071 was running 34psi peak.
Ive added a bit of data to the graph to make it a bit more understandable where the gains are.
Dyno graphs dont tell the whole story and cant graph responsiveness to throttle input but rest assured, this is just an absolutely awesome turbo & manifold combo... my favourite YB turbo by far now thanks to all Mr Sheads development with them.
Last edited by Stu @ M Developments; 01-05-2015 at 11:45 AM.
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (01-05-2015)
#141
PassionFord Regular
That 3071 spooled very blooming late.
What gearbox is that car on?
The following users liked this post:
TommyB (21-10-2015)
#143
Did Someone Mention TUV
iTrader: (1)
I must say the graphs do make the GT30's appear more laggy than they actually are on the road. My graphs on page 3 clearly show 2 bar at 4200 rpm. In reality in 4th gear on the road it was over 2 bar before 4000. No idea why it seems so different on the rollers.
The following users liked this post:
turbotrev (01-05-2015)
#144
PassionFord Post Whore!!
The best example I can show is one from this week as its directly comparable for two reasons.
1) We mapped it both times.
2) NOTHING else was changed.
The car (A Sierra Cosworth -781, stdhead-16/14) originally had a GT3071 and while it went well and made over 500bhp, the owner wasnt happen with its responce times.
He went away and eventually changed to one of Marks awesome manifolds and the EFR7064 and brought it back for mapping again.
The torque and boost curves tell the story just fine.
Yes, the GT went on to make more power, but its response was rubbish (In comparison) and the owner was specifically NOT chasing figures.
He wanted responsiveness and driveability above all else. We chose to run this turbo nice and easy at just 28psi falling to 25 at top end, where as the GT3071 was running 34psi peak.
Ive added a bit of data to the graph to make it a bit more understandable where the gains are.
Dyno graphs dont tell the whole story and cant graph responsiveness to throttle input but rest assured, this is just an absolutely awesome turbo & manifold combo... my favourite YB turbo by far now thanks to all Mr Sheads development with them.
1) We mapped it both times.
2) NOTHING else was changed.
The car (A Sierra Cosworth -781, stdhead-16/14) originally had a GT3071 and while it went well and made over 500bhp, the owner wasnt happen with its responce times.
He went away and eventually changed to one of Marks awesome manifolds and the EFR7064 and brought it back for mapping again.
The torque and boost curves tell the story just fine.
Yes, the GT went on to make more power, but its response was rubbish (In comparison) and the owner was specifically NOT chasing figures.
He wanted responsiveness and driveability above all else. We chose to run this turbo nice and easy at just 28psi falling to 25 at top end, where as the GT3071 was running 34psi peak.
Ive added a bit of data to the graph to make it a bit more understandable where the gains are.
Dyno graphs dont tell the whole story and cant graph responsiveness to throttle input but rest assured, this is just an absolutely awesome turbo & manifold combo... my favourite YB turbo by far now thanks to all Mr Sheads development with them.
The 7064 is awesome and suits the yb really well.
Mark
Last edited by Stu @ M Developments; 01-05-2015 at 01:46 PM.
#145
10K+ Poster!!
The other 4x4 pug like mine is H20 COS, this had a 500bhp MAD engine on the old GT30 and the owner said mine would be MUCH quicker on the road due to how laggy his engine was, he said his 300bhp 205 would have seen it off in most instances until right up in the rev range.
#147
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
Stu what management was that car on?
Same for each turbo?
Cheers Paul
Same for each turbo?
Cheers Paul
#149
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
Cool thanks.
And that was mapped by you guys?
Cheers Paul
And that was mapped by you guys?
Cheers Paul
#151
Advanced PassionFord User
Thread Starter
Do you guys not recommend fitting aftermarket management with the efr conversions?
Cheers Paul
Cheers Paul
#153
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Yes, lots of changes low down as ive never seen a YB with that much airflow below 4500rpm before... its hammering well into load sites a GT30 will never access, its much more like a T34.48 map below 4500rpm in all honesty... just more of it in a great big ramp. Love that turbo, great work mate.
Last edited by Stu @ M Developments; 01-05-2015 at 03:34 PM.
#154
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
However, the L8 and P8 are fine as long as you dont want to run hugely over 2bar of boost (Thats all it can see without rescaling to bigger and hurting low end resolution) as the ecu couldnt care less what turbo is fitted up to 2 bar. Its speed density, it just does as its told to do, inject fuel and create spark lead at any given RPM/Load site and interpolates both vertically and horizontally between them.
All (All ?) other ECU's offer is warranty, easier mapping, more refined load and speed sites (Especially in the spark/load area to be fair) and the ability to take them with you easily from car to car, but they arent a necessity.
However - aftermarket ECU's can also offer decent features like different boost curves and limits per gear, but then so can a decent boost controller... The L8/P8 is still a capable old thing for an antique... but then so is the YB and that old tractor engine is even less advanced than its antiquated ECU. LOL. Sadly, nothing yet compares to modern O.E stuff with 12'000+ calibration tables, but maybe one day.
That said, it is what it is now, its gone and the owners a happy man for now, so any answer I give on that particular car and hardware combo is a guess, and you can make your own guesses without me sticking my neck out. LOL
Last edited by Stu @ M Developments; 01-05-2015 at 04:28 PM.
#155
Happily retired
Yes, lots of changes low down as ive never seen a YB with that much airflow below 4500rpm before... its hammering well into load sites a GT30 will never access, its much more like a T34.48 map below 4500rpm in all honesty... just more of it in a great big ramp. Love that turbo, great work mate.
Mark has been saying that for 5 years but of course why believe him he is of course trying to sell Turbo's on this site. Of course your not Stu so they believe you makes me Chuckle.
#156
Advanced PassionFord User
How come the cross over point isn't at 5252 on the EFR Stu?
Edit: Never mind, just realised it's torque against MAP
Edit: Never mind, just realised it's torque against MAP
Last edited by SiZT; 01-05-2015 at 05:45 PM.
#157
PassionFords Creator
iTrader: (12)
Credit where its due - great turbo and manifold. Best ive ever seen for a YB.
The following users liked this post:
pduane (14-05-2016)
#158
PassionFord Post Whore!!
Nature of the beast mate. We dont sell turbos and everyone knows that so I have no axe to grind either way. I earn £250 for a live map on the dyno whether its got a T3 on it or an EFR and I dont care where the customer bought it so it makes absolutely no odds to me.
Credit where its due - great turbo and manifold. Best ive ever seen for a YB.
Credit where its due - great turbo and manifold. Best ive ever seen for a YB.
Mark
#159
PassionFord Post Whore!!
For me its making the programable Ecu much more common on road cars going back to 01, Running twin scroll manifolds your first stroker engine had one but we didnt have the turbo's avl and this was prob narrow minded Garret is the only turbo to use,
The Top feed intercooler was my idea for the YB in the UK made to my wish to feed in the top with shorter cores, Now who doesnt make a top feed one,
EFR turbo and manifolds now you will see common place,
Now I will stop patting myself on my back.
Mark
#160
PassionFord Post Whore!!