Mk6 RS2000

Paul_RS · 19-08-2004, 07:58 PM

Been thinking for a while and it might be time to sell my RS turbo. I have the chance to buy a standard mk6 RS 2000 with 50k on it. I realise it wont be as fast as the turbo, but it is newer and probably more reliable. Does anyone have any views on these? I take it they are a lot cheaper to run than a turbo?

If you were logged in, you wouldn't be seeing this ad!
Register your free account today, or log in if you already have an account.

Kev.H · 19-08-2004, 08:31 PM

get ya self onto rs2000-16.co.uk theres a forum with all u need to know much underatted car IMO I had a 4x4 2k for a couple of few yrs

Less. · 19-08-2004, 08:33 PM

Lovely cars a lot more refined than the RST there quick enough

Versus_Creations · 19-08-2004, 08:42 PM

Why not have both?

rs_daz · 20-08-2004, 12:03 AM

ive had 3 rs 2000 so far including the mk6.mk6 was alil better in side wiv double air bags and air con.but i wasnt too keen on the looks.the mk5 has the bonnet bulges and i just prefered the handling.get a k&n panel filter drill the air box,decat and a gud system,superchip and ur b looking at around 160bhp

cosimtim · 20-08-2004, 12:16 AM

i drive an rs2000 mk.6 as an everyday motor, to save the miles on the cossie, & its a great little car, when standard its quicker than a standard rs turbo, both on o-60 & top end. not much in it, but its quicker. so, de-cat mongoose & a k&n & 160 bhp is yours!!!!!

danvisteon · 20-08-2004, 06:44 AM

they are a lovely car and lovely to drive

19-08-2004, 08:31 PM	#2
Kev.H PassionFord Post Whore!! Garage is empty, add now Trader Score: (0) Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 6,614 Rep Power: 17	Re: Mk6 RS2000 get ya self onto rs2000-16.co.uk theres a forum with all u need to know much underatted car IMO I had a 4x4 2k for a couple of few yrs

19-08-2004, 08:42 PM	#4
Versus_Creations Ask me a question! 1982 Ford Escort Trader Score: (1) Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Romford Essex Posts: 5,661 Rep Power: 15	Why not have both? __________________ Supplying answers since way before 2003..... Please take the time to add to feedback and reputation. http://www.youtube.com/user/oddkiddcreations www.koollondon.com

20-08-2004, 12:03 AM	#5
rs_daz PassionFord Post Troll Garage is empty, add now Trader Score: (0) Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Combe Posts: 3,097 Rep Power: 13	ive had 3 rs 2000 so far including the mk6.mk6 was alil better in side wiv double air bags and air con.but i wasnt too keen on the looks.the mk5 has the bonnet bulges and i just prefered the handling.get a k&n panel filter drill the air box,decat and a gud system,superchip and ur b looking at around 160bhp __________________

20-08-2004, 06:44 AM	#7
danvisteon Too many posts.. I need a life!! Garage is empty, add now Trader Score: (0) Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: poxy canvey island Posts: 862 Rep Power: 10	they are a lovely car and lovely to drive __________________

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

19-08-2004, 08:33 PM	#3
Less. having a mid life crisis Garage is empty, add now Trader Score: (0) Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Kent Posts: 45,244 Rep Power: 57	Lovely cars a lot more refined than the RST there quick enough

20-08-2004, 12:16 AM	#6
cosimtim Virgin Garage is empty, add now Trader Score: (0) Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 6 Rep Power: 0	i drive an rs2000 mk.6 as an everyday motor, to save the miles on the cossie, & its a great little car, when standard its quicker than a standard rs turbo, both on o-60 & top end. not much in it, but its quicker. so, de-cat mongoose & a k&n & 160 bhp is yours!!!!!

20-08-2004, 06:44 AM
PassionFord Ford Focus Paid Advertisement