Got the Saph back and got nabbed by speed camera!! Arrgh!
15-02-2007, 04:37 PM
#1
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got the Saph back and got nabbed by speed camera!! Arrgh!
Picked it up at 3.00, but as I was going there I was caught by a van on the A1, doing 60 in a 50 part they sectioned off for roadworks.
Guy was in the back of the van so I guess I'm going to get 3 points, great. Just about to get the other 3 off and was looking forward to clean licence again
Fuckin' bastards I can't believe I didn't see it!
Guy was in the back of the van so I guess I'm going to get 3 points, great. Just about to get the other 3 off and was looking forward to clean licence again
Fuckin' bastards I can't believe I didn't see it!
15-02-2007, 05:01 PM
#3
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fucking bastards, there's no arguing with them, just the brown envelope with the fine and the points.
Irony is I'm the slowest driver out, I just didn't think about there being a camera up the A1 when I'm doing 60.
But either way the car's back
Irony is I'm the slowest driver out, I just didn't think about there being a camera up the A1 when I'm doing 60.
But either way the car's back
15-02-2007, 05:24 PM
#4
You can mount a defence which is over 90% successful.
You plead GUILTY by post to NIP sent to you.
You then point out in a letter SECTION 182 of PACE has not been adhered to and the JP will almost defintiely throw it out, that's if the POLICE/CPS go ahead after this, most don't.
Section 182 of POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE, act states that you must be CAUTIONED BEFORE BEING ASKED FOR A COMMENT.
This must be done in person by a POLICE OFFICER to the allegation of speeding, as this is not done it breaches their own rules.
SPEEDCAMS are also supposed to not be PRIMA FASCIA, evidence ie there must be a suspicion of speeding first, which in basic law means certain distances/criteria have to be met, do some research and you may well get off.
tabetha
You plead GUILTY by post to NIP sent to you.
You then point out in a letter SECTION 182 of PACE has not been adhered to and the JP will almost defintiely throw it out, that's if the POLICE/CPS go ahead after this, most don't.
Section 182 of POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE, act states that you must be CAUTIONED BEFORE BEING ASKED FOR A COMMENT.
This must be done in person by a POLICE OFFICER to the allegation of speeding, as this is not done it breaches their own rules.
SPEEDCAMS are also supposed to not be PRIMA FASCIA, evidence ie there must be a suspicion of speeding first, which in basic law means certain distances/criteria have to be met, do some research and you may well get off.
tabetha
15-02-2007, 06:40 PM
#5
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tabetha
You can mount a defence which is over 90% successful.
You plead GUILTY by post to NIP sent to you.
You then point out in a letter SECTION 182 of PACE has not been adhered to and the JP will almost defintiely throw it out, that's if the POLICE/CPS go ahead after this, most don't.
Section 182 of POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE, act states that you must be CAUTIONED BEFORE BEING ASKED FOR A COMMENT.
This must be done in person by a POLICE OFFICER to the allegation of speeding, as this is not done it breaches their own rules.
SPEEDCAMS are also supposed to not be PRIMA FASCIA, evidence ie there must be a suspicion of speeding first, which in basic law means certain distances/criteria have to be met, do some research and you may well get off.
tabetha
You plead GUILTY by post to NIP sent to you.
You then point out in a letter SECTION 182 of PACE has not been adhered to and the JP will almost defintiely throw it out, that's if the POLICE/CPS go ahead after this, most don't.
Section 182 of POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE, act states that you must be CAUTIONED BEFORE BEING ASKED FOR A COMMENT.
This must be done in person by a POLICE OFFICER to the allegation of speeding, as this is not done it breaches their own rules.
SPEEDCAMS are also supposed to not be PRIMA FASCIA, evidence ie there must be a suspicion of speeding first, which in basic law means certain distances/criteria have to be met, do some research and you may well get off.
tabetha
16-02-2007, 07:24 AM
#6
Regular Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have a look at this site LeviA;
www.beatthespeedtrap.co.uk
Sign up. This blokes got lots of useful suggestions for getting off speeding tickets.
Pete
www.beatthespeedtrap.co.uk
Sign up. This blokes got lots of useful suggestions for getting off speeding tickets.
Pete
16-02-2007, 12:34 PM
#7
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by J9BBY
Have a look at this site LeviA;
www.beatthespeedtrap.co.uk
Sign up. This blokes got lots of useful suggestions for getting off speeding tickets.
Pete
www.beatthespeedtrap.co.uk
Sign up. This blokes got lots of useful suggestions for getting off speeding tickets.
Pete
Trending Topics
16-02-2007, 01:19 PM
#9
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Exeter
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by tabetha
You can mount a defence which is over 90% successful.
You plead GUILTY by post to NIP sent to you.
You then point out in a letter SECTION 182 of PACE has not been adhered to and the JP will almost defintiely throw it out, that's if the POLICE/CPS go ahead after this, most don't.
Section 182 of POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE, act states that you must be CAUTIONED BEFORE BEING ASKED FOR A COMMENT.
This must be done in person by a POLICE OFFICER to the allegation of speeding, as this is not done it breaches their own rules.
SPEEDCAMS are also supposed to not be PRIMA FASCIA, evidence ie there must be a suspicion of speeding first, which in basic law means certain distances/criteria have to be met, do some research and you may well get off.
tabetha
You plead GUILTY by post to NIP sent to you.
You then point out in a letter SECTION 182 of PACE has not been adhered to and the JP will almost defintiely throw it out, that's if the POLICE/CPS go ahead after this, most don't.
Section 182 of POLICE AND CRIMINAL EVIDENCE, act states that you must be CAUTIONED BEFORE BEING ASKED FOR A COMMENT.
This must be done in person by a POLICE OFFICER to the allegation of speeding, as this is not done it breaches their own rules.
SPEEDCAMS are also supposed to not be PRIMA FASCIA, evidence ie there must be a suspicion of speeding first, which in basic law means certain distances/criteria have to be met, do some research and you may well get off.
tabetha
16-02-2007, 02:41 PM
#10
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
To see what tabetha is referring to, look at this http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=2846
16-02-2007, 02:55 PM
#11
Can't guarantee 100% accuracy but won't swear to it either.
At least it gets the mesasage across, so there is hope.
tabetha
ps MCN did a lot of features on this exact thing.
At least it gets the mesasage across, so there is hope.
tabetha
ps MCN did a lot of features on this exact thing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdsjojo
Ford RS Cosworth Parts for Sale
1
30-08-2015 07:48 PM