Ford Puma's, any good? what to look for?
#1
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ambergate,Derbyshire
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ford Puma's, any good? what to look for?
Looking at buying my girlfriend one, but just wanted your opinions on them. I already know to watch for the rusty rear arches, as this seems common on them. Any other major things?
I'm looking for a 2000 onwards one (with the newer wheels etc), preferbly black, and without moon milage on, 70kish.
I've seen some go for what seems a bargain (like £2000 for a lowish mileage one in good nick) and then on the other end of the scale ive seen some people selling them for nearer £3500 for a simlar mileage/condition one!
whats the average price?
Dunc
I'm looking for a 2000 onwards one (with the newer wheels etc), preferbly black, and without moon milage on, 70kish.
I've seen some go for what seems a bargain (like £2000 for a lowish mileage one in good nick) and then on the other end of the scale ive seen some people selling them for nearer £3500 for a simlar mileage/condition one!
whats the average price?
Dunc
#2
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Reading/Essex
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the early pumas come with either 1.4 or 1.7 engines, the 1.4 is the same as the fiestas of that year but the 1.7 is the better engine, devopled by yamaha. the later pumas 2001 onwards had just the 1.6 black top engine, same as the one found in the focus and fiesta mk5 zetec s
They arent a bad little car, def a birds car (not really made for tall blokes), they are worth a little more then a fiesta of the same year, so 2.5k should get you a nice example
They arent a bad little car, def a birds car (not really made for tall blokes), they are worth a little more then a fiesta of the same year, so 2.5k should get you a nice example
#3
PassionFord Post Whore!!
I had one as a 1.7 as a company car and I loved it, it handled great & fuel economy was good Only thing I didn't like was the pisstake because of the image
As you say the rear arches can rust. I broke 2 gearboxes and 2 clutches but I think that was just due to how I drove it If it was mine I would have looked after it a bit better I would definitely have another one as a cheap runabout.
As you say the rear arches can rust. I broke 2 gearboxes and 2 clutches but I think that was just due to how I drove it If it was mine I would have looked after it a bit better I would definitely have another one as a cheap runabout.
#6
............
They are all extremely good. I dont know of a nother engine like the 1.6 which is 102bhp that you can cam and remap and get 150bhp from with no other mods, not even to the inlet!
1.6 was the runout model
All are ace on fuel and ace handling
#7
............
Nicest gearbox i've ever used to be honest.
Trending Topics
#9
have known a good few 1.4 lumps go at around 50k, was admittedly on fiesta's not puma's but when trying to get a 1.4 lump it was a nightmare and ended up letting the car go clanking rather than getting another lump.
Best bit was my mates misses saying should it sound like this, then reving it to red line from stone cold with it sounding like a bucket of bolts!!
Best bit was my mates misses saying should it sound like this, then reving it to red line from stone cold with it sounding like a bucket of bolts!!
#10
Too many posts.. I need a life!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ambergate,Derbyshire
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thanks for the replys people!
very helpful!
so all in all, good reports all round? just mainly the rear arches!
now, finding one!
Dunc
very helpful!
so all in all, good reports all round? just mainly the rear arches!
now, finding one!
Dunc
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post